• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究评估会使大学生对酒精类事件更敏感吗?

Do research assessments make college students more reactive to alcohol events?

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-5, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;26(2):338-44. doi: 10.1037/a0025571. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1037/a0025571
PMID:21928871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3257404/
Abstract

This study examines possible synergistic effects of alcohol-related events and postevent assessments on changes in college student readiness to change alcohol use, frequency of alcohol use, and negative consequences. Students were participants in a longitudinal study of drinking behavior. A portion of those reporting negative alcohol events/consequences (e.g., injury, vomiting, memory loss) during the parent study were randomly selected to participate in the present study (n = 492) and randomized to a postevent assessment (n = 296) or a no-assessment control (n = 196). Participants in the postevent assessment group were interviewed soon after their event, and participants in both conditions were interviewed three months after their event. Linear regression models showed higher 3-month readiness to change alcohol use in participants who received a postevent assessment than those who did not. There were reductions in drinking days, heavy drinking days, and further consequences postevent, but no differences by assessment group. However, female participants showed greater reductions in drinking days and heavy drinking days if they were assigned to assessment compared to control. There also was greater postevent reduction in drinking days among assessment group participants with high precollege alcohol severity compared to low precollege alcohol severity. Conversely, participants who reported high aversiveness of their event and were in the control group showed greater reduction in heavy drinking days than those assigned to the assessment group. Findings suggest that college student heavy drinking is reactive to alcohol events, whereas reactivity to postevent assessments may depend on gender, alcohol severity, and event aversiveness. This work highlights the importance of considering possible interactions among extratherapeutic factors in clinical outcome research.

摘要

本研究考察了与酒精相关的事件和事件后评估对大学生改变饮酒习惯、饮酒频率和负面后果的准备程度变化的协同作用。学生是一项关于饮酒行为的纵向研究的参与者。在主要研究期间报告了负面酒精事件/后果(例如,受伤、呕吐、记忆丧失)的学生中有一部分被随机选择参加本研究(n = 492),并随机分配到事件后评估(n = 296)或无评估对照组(n = 196)。接受事件后评估的参与者在事件发生后不久接受了访谈,而两种情况的参与者都在事件发生三个月后接受了访谈。线性回归模型显示,接受事件后评估的参与者在三个月时改变饮酒习惯的意愿更高。事件后饮酒天数、重度饮酒天数和进一步的后果都有所减少,但评估组之间没有差异。然而,如果女性参与者被分配到评估组而不是对照组,她们的饮酒天数和重度饮酒天数会减少更多。此外,与低大学生酒精严重程度相比,评估组中具有较高大学生前酒精严重程度的参与者在事件后,饮酒天数的减少更为明显。相反,报告对事件的高度厌恶且处于对照组的参与者比被分配到评估组的参与者在重度饮酒天数上的减少更为明显。研究结果表明,大学生重度饮酒对酒精事件有反应,而对事件后评估的反应可能取决于性别、酒精严重程度和事件厌恶程度。这项工作强调了在临床结果研究中考虑治疗外因素之间可能存在的相互作用的重要性。

相似文献

1
Do research assessments make college students more reactive to alcohol events?研究评估会使大学生对酒精类事件更敏感吗?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;26(2):338-44. doi: 10.1037/a0025571. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
2
Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.与被强制要求参加的大学生相关的特定事件和个体层面的简短干预效果的调节变量。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):616-24. doi: 10.1037/a0024508. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
Which came first: the readiness or the change? Longitudinal relationships between readiness to change and drinking among college drinkers.哪个先出现:改变的意愿还是改变本身?大学饮酒者中改变意愿与饮酒行为之间的纵向关系。
Addiction. 2010 Nov;105(11):1899-909. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03064.x. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
4
Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions.针对被强制要求参加的大学生的简短酒精干预:面对面咨询与计算机提供干预的比较。
Addiction. 2011 Mar;106(3):528-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03193.x. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
5
It's Not Just What Parents Say, It's Why They Say It: Students' Perceptions of Parents' Motives for Alcohol Communication.这不仅仅关乎父母说了什么,更在于他们为何这样说:学生对父母进行酒精相关交流动机的认知。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 May;86(3):446-454. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00045. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce college students' drinking and risky sex.随机对照试验对减少大学生饮酒和危险性行为的简短干预。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):583-94. doi: 10.1037/a0025472. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
When wanting to change is not enough: automatic appetitive processes moderate the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in hazardous-drinking college students.当仅仅有改变的意愿还不够时:自动的欲望过程会调节短期酒精干预对危险饮酒大学生的影响。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Dec 7;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-25.
8
"I'll never drink like that again": characteristics of alcohol-related incidents and predictors of motivation to change in college students.“我再也不会那样喝酒了”:大学生酒精相关事件的特征及改变动机的预测因素
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Sep;67(5):754-63. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.754.
9
Associations between Gender, Alcohol Use and Negative Consequences among Korean College Students: A National Study.性别、饮酒与韩国大学生负面后果之间的关联:一项全国性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145192.
10
Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: a pilot study.对被强制参加的豪饮大学生进行简短动机干预的临床效果:一项初步研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Jan;71(1):54-60. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.54.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol Treatment Research Contributing to Changes in Substance Use Behavior and Related Negative Consequences.酒精治疗研究对物质使用行为及相关负面后果的改变的影响。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 May;83(3):364-373. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.364.
2
Characteristics of prospectively identified negative alcohol-related events among college students.前瞻性识别的大学生负性酒精相关事件特征。
Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Randomized Study of Assessment Effects on Alcohol Use by Persons With HIV in Rural Uganda.乌干达农村地区艾滋病毒感染者酒精使用评估效果的随机研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):296-305. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.296.
4
An experimental test of assessment reactivity within a web-based brief alcohol intervention study for college students.一项针对大学生的基于网络的简短酒精干预研究中评估反应性的实验测试。
Addict Behav. 2016 Jan;52:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对重度饮酒大学生的单次酒精干预:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jul;76(4):530-43. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.530.
6
Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对青少年和青年的简短酒精干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Apr;51:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Using daily drinking data to characterize the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in an emergency room.利用日常饮酒数据来描述急诊室中简短酒精干预的效果。
Addict Behav. 2011 Mar;36(3):248-50. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Mechanisms of change in control group drinking in clinical trials of brief alcohol intervention: implications for bias toward the null.临床试验中简短酒精干预对照饮酒变化的机制:对无效假设的偏向影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Sep;29(5):498-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00174.x.
3
[Commentary] Research assessments: instruments of bias and brief interventions of the future?[评论] 研究评估:偏见的工具与未来的简短干预措施?
Addiction. 2009 Aug;104(8):1311-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02684.x.
4
Reactivity to alcohol assessment measures: an experimental test.酒精反应评估措施的反应性:一项实验测试。
Addiction. 2009 Aug;104(8):1305-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02632.x.
5
Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.针对违反校园酒精政策的学生,计算机干预与面对面干预的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):74-87. doi: 10.1037/a0014281.
6
Change over time in alcohol consumption in control groups in brief intervention studies: systematic review and meta-regression study.简短干预研究中对照组饮酒量随时间的变化:系统评价与Meta回归研究
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1-2):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
7
Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention.被要求接受酒精干预的大学生概况。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Sep;69(5):684-94. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684.
8
Changes in drinking before a mandated brief intervention with college students.对大学生进行强制简短干预前饮酒情况的变化。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Mar;69(2):286-90. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.286.
9
Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking.完成酒精使用障碍识别测试问卷对自我报告的危险饮酒影响的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):241-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02080.x.
10
Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part II. Treatment engagement and involvement.酒精治疗研究评估暴露对象反应性效应:第二部分。治疗参与度和投入度。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):529-33. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.529.