Suppr超能文献

酒精反应评估措施的反应性:一项实验测试。

Reactivity to alcohol assessment measures: an experimental test.

机构信息

University of Texas School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390-9128, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2009 Aug;104(8):1305-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02632.x.

Abstract

AIMS

Previous research has suggested that alcohol screening and assessment may affect drinking.

DESIGN

This study was a randomized test of reactivity to alcohol assessment questionnaires among a group of heavy drinking college students.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 147 university students completed a screening questionnaire and were randomized to either immediate assessment or delayed assessment. The immediate assessment group completed a set of drinking questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, while the delayed assessment group completed questionnaires only at 12 months.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes included overall volume of drinking, risky drinking and use of risk reduction behaviors.

FINDINGS

We found a significant effect of assessment on measures of risky drinking and risk reduction behaviors, but not on overall volume of drinking. Specifically, at 12 months, participants who had previously completed drinking assessments had a lower peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) (d = -0.373), were more likely to report a low score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; odds ratio = 2.55) and tended to use more strategies to moderate their alcohol consumption (d = 0.352). Risk reduction behaviors that were affected tended to be those that limited alcohol consumption, rather than those that minimized consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may have implications for the development of brief interventions.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,酒精筛查和评估可能会影响饮酒行为。

设计

本研究是一项针对一组重度饮酒大学生对酒精评估问卷反应性的随机测试。

地点和参与者

共有 147 名大学生完成了一项筛选问卷,并被随机分配至即时评估或延迟评估组。即时评估组在基线、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时完成了一组饮酒问卷,而延迟评估组仅在 12 个月时完成问卷。

测量

主要结果包括总体饮酒量、危险饮酒和使用风险降低行为。

结果

我们发现评估对危险饮酒和风险降低行为的测量有显著影响,但对总体饮酒量没有影响。具体来说,在 12 个月时,之前完成过饮酒评估的参与者的血液酒精峰值浓度(BAC)较低(d = -0.373),更有可能报告酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的低分(优势比 = 2.55),并且倾向于使用更多策略来适度控制饮酒(d = 0.352)。受影响的风险降低行为往往是那些限制饮酒的行为,而不是那些最小化后果的行为。

结论

这些结果可能对简短干预措施的发展有影响。

相似文献

2
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;2015(12):CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Context and mechanisms of reactivity to assessment and treatment.
Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):249-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02123.x.
8
Development of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey.保护性行动策略调查的开发。
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):698-705. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.698.
9
Validity of the alcohol use disorders identification test in college students.大学生酒精使用障碍识别测试的效度
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004 Jun;28(6):914-20. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000128239.87611.f5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验