Suppr超能文献

根据进食障碍患者和治疗师的意见,哪些是相关的康复标准?

Which criteria for recovery are relevant according to eating disorder patients and therapists?

机构信息

Psychological Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eat Disord. 2011 Oct-Dec;19(5):441-51. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2011.618738.

Abstract

In the treatment of eating disorders (ED), no consensus exists on relevant criteria for recovery and goals for treatment. Which criteria do ED patients and therapists evaluate as most relevant for recovery? And do patients and therapists differ in their evaluations? This article presents a review of research on the opinions about recovery criteria of former patients and therapists. Criteria most often mentioned by the patients could be divided into the following themes: eating and drinking; physical activity and exercising; attitude towards food and weight; body evaluation; relaxation; physical recovery; psychological recovery; emotion regulation; social relations; sexual attitude; and comorbidity. Only slight differences were found between the opinions of former patients and therapists.

摘要

在进食障碍(ED)的治疗中,对于相关的康复标准和治疗目标尚未达成共识。ED 患者和治疗师认为哪些标准对康复最相关?患者和治疗师的评价是否存在差异?本文综述了对既往患者和治疗师对康复标准的看法的研究。患者最常提到的标准可以分为以下主题:饮食;身体活动和锻炼;对食物和体重的态度;身体评估;放松;身体康复;心理康复;情绪调节;社会关系;性态度;和合并症。既往患者和治疗师的意见仅存在细微差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验