Bowden Louise, Faulkner Ronan, Clancy Conor, Gallagher Aoife, Devine Mark, Gorman Dermot, O'Reilly Geraldine, Dowling Anita
Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Sep;147(1-2):210-4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr301. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Current guidelines quote tolerances for automatic exposure control (AEC) device performance for X-ray systems as 'Baseline ± X %'. However, in the situation where a baseline figure has not yet been achieved, as in the case of commissioning assessments, this tolerance is not relevant. The purpose of this work is to provide mean doses for direct digital radiography (DDR) X-ray system, operating in AEC, against which comparisons can be made. Dose measurements have been recorded under AEC operation on 29 DDR detectors from three different manufacturers. Two different testing protocols were examined: (1) water equivalent phantoms in front of the DDR detector and (2) aluminium block at the tube head. The average patient exit dose, using the aluminium block was 4.6 μGy with the antiscatter grid in place and 4.0 μGy with the grid removed. Using the water phantoms, the average dose was measured at 17.1 μGy with the antiscatter grid in place and 5.4 μGy with grid removed. Based on these results, it is clear that different testing configurations significantly impact on the measured dose.
当前指南引用的X射线系统自动曝光控制(AEC)设备性能公差为“基线±X%”。然而,在尚未达到基线数值的情况下,如在调试评估中,此公差并不适用。本研究的目的是提供在AEC模式下运行的直接数字化X射线摄影(DDR)系统的平均剂量,以便进行比较。已在AEC模式下对来自三个不同制造商的29个DDR探测器进行了剂量测量。研究了两种不同的测试方案:(1)在DDR探测器前放置水等效体模;(2)在管头处放置铝块。使用铝块时,安装防散射格栅时患者的平均出射剂量为4.6 μGy,移除格栅时为4.0 μGy。使用水体模时,安装防散射格栅时的平均剂量为17.1 μGy,移除格栅时为5.4 μGy。基于这些结果,很明显不同的测试配置会对测量剂量产生显著影响。