Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):261-77. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.211. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Over the past three decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the neurobiology of Alzheimer's disease. In recent years, the first attempts to implement novel mechanism-based treatments brought rather disappointing results, with low, if any, drug efficacy and significant side effects. A discrepancy between our expectations based on preclinical models and the results of clinical trials calls for a revision of our theoretical views and questions every stage of translation-from how we model the disease to how we run clinical trials. In the following sections, we will use some specific examples of the therapeutics from acetylcholinesterase inhibitors to recent anti-Aβ immunization and γ-secretase inhibition to discuss whether preclinical studies could predict the limitations in efficacy and side effects that we were so disappointed to observe in recent clinical trials. We discuss ways to improve both the predictive validity of mouse models and the translation of knowledge between preclinical and clinical stages of drug development.
在过去的三十年中,人们对阿尔茨海默病的神经生物学有了更深入的了解。近年来,人们首次尝试实施基于新机制的治疗方法,但结果令人失望,药物疗效低,如果有的话,且副作用明显。这与我们基于临床前模型的预期和临床试验结果之间存在差异,需要对我们的理论观点进行修正,并对从疾病建模到临床试验实施的每个阶段进行质疑。在接下来的部分中,我们将使用一些特定的治疗方法的例子,从乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂到最近的抗 Aβ 免疫和γ-分泌酶抑制,来讨论临床前研究是否可以预测我们在最近的临床试验中观察到的疗效和副作用的局限性。我们讨论了如何提高小鼠模型的预测有效性,以及如何在药物开发的临床前和临床阶段之间更好地转化知识。