• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读理解和表达性写作:优秀和较差阅读理解者之间的比较。

Reading comprehension and expressive writing: a comparison between good and poor comprehenders.

机构信息

University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;46(1):87-96. doi: 10.1177/0022219411417876. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1177/0022219411417876
PMID:21940461
Abstract

This study investigated expressive writing in 8- to 10-year-old children with different levels of reading comprehension. Poor and good comprehenders were presented with three expressive writing tasks where the modality (pictorial vs. verbal) and the text genre (narrative vs. descriptive) varied. Results showed that poor comprehenders' performance was minimally influenced by the modality of the prompt. In fact, their performance was generally worse than that of good comprehenders and affected by the text genre, as the quality of their narratives was generally lower than that of good comprehenders. However, in the descriptive text condition, their performance was comparable to that of good comprehenders. One can conclude that their problems depend on the characteristics of the narrative text where coherence and causality are important elements.

摘要

本研究调查了阅读理解水平不同的 8 至 10 岁儿童的表达性写作。我们为较差和较好的阅读理解者呈现了三种不同的表达性写作任务,其中提示的模态(图像与文字)和文本类型(叙述与描述)有所不同。结果表明,较差的阅读理解者的表现受提示模态的影响极小。事实上,他们的表现普遍不如较好的阅读理解者,并且受到文本类型的影响,因为他们的叙述质量普遍低于较好的阅读理解者。然而,在描述性文本条件下,他们的表现与较好的阅读理解者相当。可以得出结论,他们的问题取决于叙事文本的特点,其中连贯性和因果关系是重要因素。

相似文献

1
Reading comprehension and expressive writing: a comparison between good and poor comprehenders.阅读理解和表达性写作:优秀和较差阅读理解者之间的比较。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;46(1):87-96. doi: 10.1177/0022219411417876. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
2
Oral and Written Expression in Children With Reading Comprehension Difficulties.阅读理解困难儿童的口语和书面表达
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Jan-Feb;49(1):65-76. doi: 10.1177/0022219414528539. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
3
Further evidence of poor comprehenders' difficulty with expressive writing: Exploring the role of inferences.理解能力较差者在表达性写作方面存在困难的进一步证据:探究推理的作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Apr-May;51-52:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Are poor Chinese text comprehenders also poor in written composition?中文理解能力差的中国人写作能力也差吗?
Ann Dyslexia. 2013 Oct;63(3-4):217-38. doi: 10.1007/s11881-013-0081-0. Epub 2013 May 11.
5
The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders.在阅读理解中,抑制在优秀读者和较差读者中的具体作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;43(6):541-52. doi: 10.1177/0022219410371676. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
6
Poor comprehenders in the classroom: teacher ratings of behavior in children with poor reading comprehension and its relationship with individual differences in working memory.课堂上的阅读能力差的学生:教师对阅读理解能力差的儿童行为的评价及其与工作记忆个体差异的关系。
J Learn Disabil. 2014 May-Jun;47(3):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0022219412454172. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
7
Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties.患有特定阅读理解困难的儿童概况。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Dec;76(Pt 4):683-96. doi: 10.1348/000709905X67610.
8
Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: an investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits.儿童记忆与阅读理解中的个体差异:语义和抑制缺陷研究
Memory. 2006 Jul;14(5):553-69. doi: 10.1080/09658210600624481.
9
Linguistic and Cognitive Profiles of 8- to 15-Year-Old Children With Specific Reading Comprehension Difficulties.8至15岁特定阅读理解困难儿童的语言和认知特征
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Mar/Apr;50(2):128-142. doi: 10.1177/0022219415613080. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Online and offline inferential and textual processing of poor comprehenders: Evidence from a probing method.阅读理解能力较差者的在线和离线推理及文本处理:来自一种探测方法的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Mar;155:12-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-efficacy for writing and written text quality of upper secondary students with and without reading difficulties.有阅读困难和无阅读困难的高中生的写作自我效能感与书面文本质量
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1231817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231817. eCollection 2023.
2
Research on Expressive Writing in Psychology: A Forty-year Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Current Status and Research Trends.心理学领域中表达性写作的研究:一项四十年的文献计量分析及现状与研究趋势可视化
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:825626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825626. eCollection 2022.
3
The Role of Working Memory on Writing Processes.
工作记忆在写作过程中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 27;12:738395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738395. eCollection 2021.
4
The Comprehension Problems of Children with Poor Reading Comprehension despite Adequate Decoding: A Meta-Analysis.尽管具备足够的解码能力,但阅读理解能力差的儿童的理解问题:一项元分析。
Rev Educ Res. 2018 Jun;88(3):366-400. doi: 10.3102/0034654317749187. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
5
The Contribution of Verbal Working Memory to Deaf Children's Oral and Written Production.言语工作记忆对聋童口语和书面表达的作用。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Jul;20(3):203-14. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env005. Epub 2015 Mar 22.