• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同测试日挑战对五选择连续反应时任务表现的比较影响。

Comparative effects of different test day challenges on performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.

作者信息

Amitai Nurith, Markou Athina

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0603, CA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 2011 Oct;125(5):764-74. doi: 10.1037/a0024722.

DOI:10.1037/a0024722
PMID:21942437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3187548/
Abstract

The 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) is a valuable cognitive test that permits the simultaneous assessment of several different cognitive modalities, including attention, impulse control, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Increasing task difficulty on test days through various challenges can further enhance the versatility of this test by selectively enhancing the cognitive load on different aspects of the task. Systematic comparisons of the effects of different test day challenges on 5-CSRTT performance are essential to verify how these challenges affect different task measures and which manipulations are best suited for future studies of different aspects of cognition. We trained Wistar rats in the 5-CSRTT under standard conditions, then challenged them on the test days by (1) decreasing the duration of the stimulus to be detected, (2) increasing the time interval between trials (intertrial interval, ITI), (3) randomly varying the ITI, or (4) adding a flashing light distractor. All test day challenges produced distinct profiles of performance disruption that reflected differential effects on different cognitive modalities. Decreased stimulus duration selectively impaired attentional performance, while increased ITI increased impulsive-like premature responses and decreased trials completed. Variable ITI induced only mild, nonsignificant disruptions in response inhibition and processing speed, while the flashing light distractor produced comprehensive impairment affecting multiple aspects of 5-CSRTT performance, including disrupted attention and increased premature and timeout responses. This improved understanding of the effects of different test day challenges in the 5-CSRTT will allow researchers to use these manipulations of a valuable cognitive test to their full potential.

摘要

五选择连续反应时任务(5-CSRTT)是一项有价值的认知测试,它能够同时评估多种不同的认知模式,包括注意力、冲动控制、处理速度和认知灵活性。在测试日通过各种挑战增加任务难度,可以通过有选择地增加任务不同方面的认知负荷,进一步提高该测试的通用性。系统比较不同测试日挑战对5-CSRTT表现的影响,对于验证这些挑战如何影响不同的任务指标以及哪些操作最适合未来对认知不同方面的研究至关重要。我们在标准条件下对Wistar大鼠进行5-CSRTT训练,然后在测试日通过以下方式对它们进行挑战:(1)缩短要检测的刺激持续时间;(2)增加试验之间的时间间隔(试验间隔,ITI);(3)随机改变ITI;或(4)添加闪烁灯光干扰物。所有测试日挑战都产生了不同的表现破坏模式,反映了对不同认知模式的不同影响。刺激持续时间缩短选择性地损害了注意力表现,而ITI增加则增加了类似冲动的过早反应并减少了完成的试验次数。可变ITI仅在反应抑制和处理速度方面引起轻微的、不显著的干扰,而闪烁灯光干扰物则产生了全面的损害,影响了5-CSRTT表现的多个方面,包括注意力中断以及过早和超时反应增加。对5-CSRTT中不同测试日挑战影响的这种更好理解,将使研究人员能够充分利用对这一有价值的认知测试的这些操作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/ffadabc3d650/nihms313200f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/98fdc242d311/nihms313200f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/4cec1471df3a/nihms313200f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/9c2b30c7f244/nihms313200f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/ffadabc3d650/nihms313200f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/98fdc242d311/nihms313200f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/4cec1471df3a/nihms313200f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/9c2b30c7f244/nihms313200f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac49/3187548/ffadabc3d650/nihms313200f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effects of different test day challenges on performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.不同测试日挑战对五选择连续反应时任务表现的比较影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Oct;125(5):764-74. doi: 10.1037/a0024722.
2
Effects of early life stress and adolescent ethanol exposure on adult cognitive performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task in Wistar male rats.早期生活应激和青春期乙醇暴露对Wistar雄性大鼠在5选串行反应时任务中成年后认知能力的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 May;234(9-10):1549-1556. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4555-3. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Assessment of attention threshold in rats by titration of visual cue duration during the five choice serial reaction time task.在五项选择连续反应时任务中,通过滴定视觉线索持续时间来评估大鼠的注意力阈值。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Feb 15;241:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Premature responses in the five-choice serial reaction time task reflect rodents' temporal strategies: evidence from no-light and pharmacological challenges.五选择连续反应时任务中的过早反应反映了啮齿动物的时间策略:来自无光和药理学挑战的证据。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Oct;233(19-20):3513-25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4389-4. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Attention, impulsivity, and cognitive flexibility in adult male rats exposed to ethanol binge during adolescence as measured in the five-choice serial reaction time task: the effects of task and ethanol challenges.注意力、冲动性和认知灵活性在青春期暴露于乙醇 binge 的成年雄性大鼠中的测量:任务和乙醇挑战的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):433-42. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2458-2. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
An automated home-cage-based 5-choice serial reaction time task for rapid assessment of attention and impulsivity in rats.一种基于自动化家庭笼的 5 选择序列反应时任务,用于快速评估大鼠的注意力和冲动性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Jul;236(7):2015-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05189-0. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
7
Attentional performance of (C57BL/6Jx129Sv)F2 mice in the five-choice serial reaction time task.(C57BL/6J×129Sv)F2小鼠在五选择连续反应时任务中的注意力表现。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Dec 30;89(5):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
8
Evidence for improved performance in cognitive tasks following selective NR2B NMDA receptor antagonist pre-treatment in the rat.大鼠经选择性NR2B NMDA受体拮抗剂预处理后认知任务表现改善的证据。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Apr;179(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2203-9. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
9
Influence of intertrial interval on basal and drug-induced impulsive action in the 5-choice serial reaction time task: Effects of d-amphetamine and (±)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI).5选串行反应时任务中试次间隔对基础及药物诱发冲动行为的影响:右旋苯丙胺和(±)-2,5-二甲氧基-4-碘苯丙胺(DOI)的作用
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 1;662:351-355. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.058. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
A schizophrenia relevant 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task for mice assessing broad monitoring, distractibility and impulsivity.一种用于评估小鼠广泛监测、注意力分散和冲动性的与精神分裂症相关的5选串行反应时任务。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jul;234(13):2047-2062. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4611-z. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct neuronal processes in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediate changes in attention load and nicotine pro-cognitive effects in male rats.腹内侧前额叶皮层中不同的神经元活动过程介导了雄性大鼠注意力负荷的变化以及尼古丁的促认知作用。
Front Neural Circuits. 2025 Mar 7;19:1540975. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2025.1540975. eCollection 2025.
2
Adolescent morphine exposure induced long-term cognitive impairment and prefrontal neurostructural abnormality in adulthood in male mice.青春期雄性小鼠接触吗啡会导致成年期出现长期认知障碍和前额叶神经结构异常。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 28;10(23):e40782. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40782. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Animal models of ADHD.注意力缺陷多动障碍的动物模型。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2011;7:149-85. doi: 10.1007/7854_2010_102.
2
Effects of aripiprazole, olanzapine, and haloperidol in a model of cognitive deficit of schizophrenia in rats: relationship with glutamate release in the medial prefrontal cortex.阿立哌唑、奥氮平、氟哌啶醇对精神分裂症认知缺陷大鼠模型的影响:与内侧前额叶皮质谷氨酸释放的关系。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Apr;214(3):639-52. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2065-7. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
3
Sertindole restores attentional performance and suppresses glutamate release induced by the NMDA receptor antagonist CPP.
Attentional processing in the rat dorsal posterior parietal cortex.
大鼠背侧后顶叶皮质的注意力加工
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2024 Dec;216:108004. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2024.108004. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
4
Knowledge by omission: the significance of omissions in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.知识的缺失:5 -choice 序列反应时任务中缺失的意义。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Jul;241(7):1319-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06564-2. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Assessing attention and impulsivity in the variable stimulus duration and variable intertrial interval rodent continuous performance test schedules using dopamine receptor antagonists in female C57BL/6JRj mice.使用多巴胺受体拮抗剂在雌性 C57BL/6JRj 小鼠的可变刺激持续时间和可变试验间隔棒状连续绩效测试方案中评估注意力和冲动性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug;240(8):1651-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06387-7. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Assessing attention and impulsivity in the variable stimulus duration and variable intertrial interval rodent continuous performance test schedules using noradrenaline receptor antagonists in female C57BL/6JRj mice.使用去甲肾上腺素受体拮抗剂评估雌性 C57BL/6JRj 小鼠在可变刺激持续时间和可变试验间隔棒状连续表现测试方案中的注意力和冲动性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug;240(8):1629-1650. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06385-9. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
7
Longitudinal assessment of cognitive function in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's-related beta-amyloidosis.阿尔茨海默病相关β-淀粉样蛋白病 APPswe/PS1dE9 小鼠模型认知功能的纵向评估。
Neurobiol Aging. 2023 Aug;128:85-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
8
Interactions between impulsivity and MDPV self-administration in rats.大鼠冲动性与 MDPV 自身给药的相互作用。
Addict Biol. 2022 May;27(3):e13168. doi: 10.1111/adb.13168.
9
Effects of ketamine optical isomers, psilocybin, psilocin and norpsilocin on time estimation and cognition in rats.氯胺酮对映异构体、裸盖菇素、二甲氧基色胺和去甲裸盖菇素对大鼠时间估计和认知的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jun;239(6):1689-1703. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06020-5. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Cognitive performance during adulthood in a rat model of neonatal diffuse white matter injury.成年期大鼠新生儿弥漫性白质损伤模型中的认知表现。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Mar;239(3):745-764. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06053-w. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
赛曲哚尔恢复 NMDA 受体拮抗剂 CPP 诱导的注意力表现和抑制谷氨酸释放。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Apr;214(3):625-37. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2066-6. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
4
Sub-optimal performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats was sensitive to methylphenidate, atomoxetine and d-amphetamine, but unaffected by the COMT inhibitor tolcapone.在大鼠的 5 -choice 序列反应时任务中,表现不佳对哌甲酯、托莫西汀和安非他命敏感,但对 COMT 抑制剂托卡朋没有影响。
Neurosci Res. 2011 Jan;69(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Impulsivity across the course of bipolar disorder.双相障碍病程中的冲动性。
Bipolar Disord. 2010 May;12(3):285-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00806.x.
6
Disruption of performance in the five-choice serial reaction time task induced by administration of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: relevance to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.NMDA 受体拮抗剂给药导致的五选择连续反应时任务表现障碍:与精神分裂症认知功能障碍的相关性。
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 1;68(1):5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 May 21.
7
Effects of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3 agonism and antagonism on schizophrenia-like cognitive deficits induced by phencyclidine in rats.代谢型谷氨酸受体 2/3 激动剂和拮抗剂对苯环己哌啶诱导的大鼠似精神分裂症认知缺陷的影响。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 Aug 10;639(1-3):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.12.040. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
8
Role of kappa-opioid receptors in the effects of salvinorin A and ketamine on attention in rats.κ-阿片受体在沙林醇 A 和氯胺酮对大鼠注意力影响中的作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jun;210(2):263-74. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1834-7. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
9
The duration of nicotine-induced attentional enhancement in the five-choice serial reaction time task: lack of long-lasting cognitive improvement.在五选择连续反应时任务中尼古丁诱导的注意力增强的持续时间:缺乏持久的认知改善。
Behav Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;20(8):742-54. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328333b290.
10
Effects of antipsychotic drugs on MK-801-induced attentional and motivational deficits in rats.抗精神病药物对MK-801诱导的大鼠注意力和动机缺陷的影响。
Neuropharmacology. 2009 Mar;56(4):788-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.01.004.