• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄和种族差异导致接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的机制。

Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 1st Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4032-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06695-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06695-0
PMID:30767140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6694001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Black patients and older adults are less likely to receive minimally invasive hernia repair. These differences by race and age may be influenced by surgeon-specific utilization rate of minimally invasive repair. In this study, we explored the association between race, age, and surgeon utilization of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with the likelihood of receiving MIS inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients undergoing elective primary inguinal hernia repair from 2012 to 2016, using data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, a 72-hospital clinical registry. Surgeons were stratified by proportion of MIS performed. Using hierarchical logistic regression models, we investigated the association between receiving MIS repair and race, age, and surgeon MIS utilization rate.

RESULTS

Out of 4667 patients, 1253 (27%) received MIS repair. Out of 190 surgeons, 81 (43%) performed only open repair. Controlling for surgeon MIS utilization, race was not associated with MIS receipt (OR 0.93, p = 0.775), but older patients were less likely to receive MIS repair (OR 0.41, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Race differences were explained by surgeon MIS utilization, implicating access to MIS-performing surgeon as a mediator. Conversely, age disparity was independent of MIS utilization, even after adjusting for comorbidities, indicating some degree of provider bias against performing MIS repair in older patients. Interventions to address disparities should include systematic efforts to improve access, as well as provider and patient education for older adults.

摘要

背景

黑人和老年人接受微创疝修复的可能性较低。这种种族和年龄的差异可能受到外科医生微创修复具体使用率的影响。在这项研究中,我们探讨了种族、年龄和外科医生对微创手术(MIS)的使用与接受 MIS 腹股沟疝修复的可能性之间的关系。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2012 年至 2016 年期间接受择期原发性腹股沟疝修复的患者,数据来自密歇根手术质量协作组织(一个 72 家医院的临床登记处)。外科医生按 MIS 实施比例分层。我们使用分层逻辑回归模型,调查了接受 MIS 修复与种族、年龄和外科医生 MIS 使用率之间的关系。

结果

在 4667 名患者中,有 1253 名(27%)接受了 MIS 修复。在 190 名外科医生中,有 81 名(43%)仅进行开放修复。控制外科医生 MIS 使用率后,种族与 MIS 接受率无关(OR 0.93,p=0.775),但老年患者接受 MIS 修复的可能性较低(OR 0.41,p<0.001)。

结论

种族差异可由外科医生 MIS 使用率解释,提示 MIS 手术医生的获得情况是一个中介因素。相反,即使在调整了合并症后,年龄差异也与 MIS 使用率无关,这表明在老年患者中,提供者存在对 MIS 修复的一定程度的偏见。解决差异的干预措施应包括系统地努力改善获取途径,以及对老年患者进行提供者和患者教育。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.年龄和种族差异导致接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的机制。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4032-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06695-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Surgeon utilization of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a population-based study.外科医生对腹股沟疝修补术微创技术的应用:一项基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):486-493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6322-x. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Current state of robotic use in inguinal hernia repair: a survey of minimally invasive hernia surgeons.机器人在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用现状:微创疝外科医生的调查。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00709-6. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Trends in minimally invasive and open inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of ACGME general surgery case logs.微创和开放腹股沟疝修补术的趋势:ACGME 普通外科手术日志分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2344-2349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10805-y. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
Opioid utilization in minimally invasive versus open inguinal hernia repair.微创手术与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的阿片类药物使用情况。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Access to common laparoscopic general surgical procedures: do racial disparities exist?普通腹腔镜普外科手术的可及性:是否存在种族差异?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1376-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06912-w. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
Variation in surgical approach and postoperative complication among older adults undergoing ventral hernia repair.老年人行腹疝修补术的手术入路和术后并发症的差异。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5769-5777. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11136-8. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
8
Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Common Abdominal Surgical Procedures-The Impact of Access to a Minimally Invasive Approach.常见腹部外科手术后结局的种族差异-微创方法的可及性的影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Predictors of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2612-2619. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6557-6. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Predictors of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.056. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent emergent hernia repairs: who is at risk?复发性急诊疝修补术:哪些人有风险?
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11914-y.
2
The mentoring effects of learning curve of total extraperitoneal hernioplasty: the CUSUM analysis of the pioneer and second-generation surgeon.完全腹膜外疝修补术学习曲线的指导作用:对先驱者和第二代外科医生的累积和分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3337-3345. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11729-x. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Rates of Minimally Invasive Surgery After Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Common General Surgery Operations.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgeon utilization of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a population-based study.外科医生对腹股沟疝修补术微创技术的应用:一项基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):486-493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6322-x. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: Patient reported outcomes in the elderly from a single centre - A prospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术:单中心老年患者报告的结局——一项前瞻性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Aug 29;22:12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.08.013. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.
普通普外科手术引入机器人辅助手术后微创手术的发生率。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jan 31;6(1):e546. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000546. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Use of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair in Current Practice.当前实践中生物材料和生物合成补片在腹疝修补中的应用
JAMA Surg. 2025 Feb 1;160(2):163-170. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5293.
5
Robotic availability, not payor status, determines access to robotic emergency general surgery hernia repair in California and Florida.在加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州,机器人的可用性而非付款方身份决定了是否能够获得机器人紧急普通外科疝修补术。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6923-6929. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11283-y. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Referrals.复杂腹壁重建转诊中的种族和社会经济差异
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 May 30;3:12946. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.12946. eCollection 2024.
7
Impact of race and ethnicity on rates of emergent ventral hernia repair (VHR): has anything changed?种族和民族对急诊腹疝修补术(VHR)发生率的影响:有什么变化吗?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5561-5569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09732-7. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
Comparing functional outcomes in minimally invasive versus open inguinal hernia repair using the army physical fitness test.比较使用陆军体能测试评估微创与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的功能结果。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):105-111. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02650-6. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
9
Ventral hernia repair and mesh use in females of childbearing age.育龄女性腹疝修补术及补片应用
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3084-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09429-x. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Racial Disparities in Surgery for Malignant Bowel Obstruction.恶性肠梗阻手术中的种族差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 May;29(5):3122-3133. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11161-0. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Racial disparities in the use of laparoscopic surgery to treat colonic diverticulitis Are not fully explained by socioeconomics or disease complexity.腹腔镜手术治疗结肠憩室炎的种族差异不能完全由社会经济因素或疾病复杂性来解释。
Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):673-677. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Disparities in Treatment of Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Population-based Cohort.高危前列腺癌患者治疗的差异:基于人群队列的结果
Urology. 2016 Sep;95:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Elderly and octogenarian cohort: Comparable outcomes with nonelderly cohort after open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.老年及八旬老人队列:开放或腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后与非老年队列的可比结局。
Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):1137-43; discussion 1143-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
7
Less Pain 1 Year After Total Extra-peritoneal Repair Compared With Lichtenstein Using Local Anesthesia: Data From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.与使用局部麻醉的Lichtenstein手术相比,完全腹膜外修补术后1年疼痛减轻:一项随机对照临床试验的数据。
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):240-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001289.
8
Utilization of surgical procedures and racial disparity in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.前列腺切除术后尿失禁治疗中手术方法的应用及种族差异
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Aug;35(6):733-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22790. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的当前实践:基于人群的分析。
Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):725-33. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1358-5. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Racial/ethnic disparities in emergency general surgery: explained by hospital-level characteristics?急诊普通外科中的种族/民族差异:由医院层面的特征所解释?
Am J Surg. 2015 Apr;209(4):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.11.005. Epub 2015 Jan 14.