Lowe Michael, Hill Nikki, Page Andrew, Chen Suephy, Delman Keith A
Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):1050-3.
Disagreement persists regarding the role that various biopsy methods should play in the diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. We analyzed the indications for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and the rates of SLN involvement among biopsy techniques and deep margin status to attempt to determine impact of shave biopsy on surgical management of patients with thin melanoma. All patients who underwent SLN biopsy for melanoma with Breslow thickness less than 1 mm between 1998 and 2006 were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared using χ(2) tests for categorical variables. Continuous variables were reported as a mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using t test. Of the 260 patients diagnosed with thin melanomas, 159 (61.2%) were diagnosed by shave biopsy; 101 (38.8%) were diagnosed by other techniques. Of the 159 patients diagnosed by shave biopsy, 18.2 per cent (n = 29) underwent SLN biopsy with the only indication being positive deep margin. The frequency of SLN positivity did not differ between the biopsy groups (3.1% vs 4.0%, P = 0.726) or between groups that had positive or negative deep margins (3.0% vs 3.3%, P = 0.839, respectively). For patients unable to undergo general anesthesia, the increased rate of performing SLN biopsy resulting from shave biopsy should limit its use in these patients. However, shave biopsy is a reasonable diagnostic method for patients at low risk for general anesthesia, particularly because it results in comparably low rates of positive SLN. Thus each patient's unique clinical situation should be considered when deciding which biopsy technique is appropriate.
关于各种活检方法在原发性皮肤黑色素瘤诊断中应发挥的作用,目前仍存在分歧。我们分析了前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检的指征、活检技术与深部切缘状态之间SLN受累的发生率,试图确定削切活检对薄型黑色素瘤患者手术治疗的影响。确定了1998年至2006年间所有因Breslow厚度小于1mm的黑色素瘤而接受SLN活检的患者。使用χ²检验对分类变量比较患者和肿瘤特征。连续变量以均值±标准差报告,并使用t检验进行分析。在260例被诊断为薄型黑色素瘤的患者中,159例(61.2%)通过削切活检确诊;101例(38.8%)通过其他技术确诊。在159例通过削切活检确诊的患者中,18.2%(n = 29)接受了SLN活检,唯一指征是深部切缘阳性。活检组之间SLN阳性频率无差异(3.1%对4.0%,P = 0.726),深部切缘阳性或阴性组之间也无差异(分别为3.0%对3.3%,P = 0.839)。对于无法接受全身麻醉的患者,削切活检导致SLN活检执行率增加,应限制其在这些患者中的使用。然而,削切活检对于全身麻醉低风险患者是一种合理的诊断方法,特别是因为其SLN阳性率相对较低。因此,在决定哪种活检技术合适时,应考虑每个患者独特的临床情况。