Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Dec;12(6):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0287-y. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
In their article, "Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear," Ren et al. (Nat Commun 2:216, 2011) claim to provide "the first direct experimental evidence of power amplification in the sensitive living cochlea." While we recognize the technical challenges of the experiments and appreciate the beauty of the data, the authors' analysis and interpretation of the measurements are invalid. We review the concept of impedance (i.e., the ratio of pressure to velocity) as it applies to cochlear mechanics and show that Ren et al. mistakenly equate the impedances near the basilar membrane and stapes with the impedance characteristic of an infinite, uniform tube of fluid. As a consequence of this error, Ren et al.'s measurements and analysis provide no evidence for power amplification in the cochlea. Compelling evidence for power amplification has, however, been previously provided by others.
在他们的文章《敏感沙鼠耳蜗功率增益的测量》中,Ren 等人(Nat Commun 2:216, 2011)声称提供了“灵敏活体耳蜗中功率放大的第一个直接实验证据”。虽然我们承认实验的技术挑战,并赞赏数据的美观,但作者对测量结果的分析和解释是无效的。我们回顾了阻抗的概念(即压力与速度的比值)在耳蜗力学中的应用,并表明 Ren 等人错误地将基底膜和镫骨附近的阻抗与无限、均匀的流体管的阻抗特性等同起来。由于这个错误,Ren 等人的测量和分析没有为耳蜗中的功率放大提供任何证据。然而,其他人之前已经提供了令人信服的证据证明功率放大的存在。