Kaiser Family Foundation, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):1097-103. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460587. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
One year after passage, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) remains a divisive topic. Most publicly released polls on the law have focused on the views of Americans as a whole. But with much of the responsibility of implementation lying with the states, this essay explores whether opinion differs geographically. The analysis finds that views on the health reform law do differ by region, and these differences are most likely driven by the political leanings of a given area. While opinion nationally differs by age and race, this pattern does not hold when looking by region. Areas that have a larger share of uninsured and are slated to receive greater federal funding under the ACA also do not differ in their opinions. These data suggest that regional variations in attitudes about the ACA are based less on the demographic structure of a region and more on the political ideologies of residents in a given region. As implementation of the law continues, this analysis shows that national opinion data mask important regional variations in views of the ACA.
《平价医疗法案》通过一年后,依然是个极具争议的话题。大多数公开发布的关于该法案的民意调查都集中在美国民众的整体看法上。但由于实施的大部分责任在于各州,因此本文探讨了该法案在地理上是否存在不同的看法。分析发现,人们对医改法案的看法确实因地区而异,而造成这种差异的主要原因可能是该地区的政治倾向。虽然全国范围内的民意因年龄和种族而有所不同,但按地区来看,这种模式并不成立。在《平价医疗法案》下,那些拥有更多未参保人群并且预计将获得更多联邦资金的地区,在意见上也没有差异。这些数据表明,《平价医疗法案》的态度在地区上的差异,与其说是基于一个地区的人口结构,不如说是基于该地区居民的政治意识形态。随着该法案的实施,这一分析表明,全国性的民意数据掩盖了对《平价医疗法案》看法的重要地区差异。