Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2033-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0262.
This analysis of national opinion polls shows that a majority of Americans support increased spending on public health in general and that they see public health interventions as saving money in the long term. At the same time, many do not favor increased federal spending in a number of areas that public health officials deem important. In addition, polls show striking partisan differences, with Republicans much less supportive than Democrats of additional spending on public health. This split may have political implications for the public health component of the new health reform law if there is a change in party control of one or more houses of Congress after the November 2010 elections. As a result, in order to sustain public support for increased spending, it will be critically important to give examples of cost savings from public health programs and to highlight how they have reduced mortality from major chronic illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease, and HIV/AIDS.
这项全国民意调查分析表明,大多数美国人支持增加公共卫生支出,他们认为公共卫生干预措施从长期来看可以省钱。但与此同时,许多人并不赞成在一些公共卫生官员认为重要的领域增加联邦支出。此外,民意调查还显示出明显的党派分歧,共和党人比民主党人更不支持增加公共卫生支出。如果 2010 年 11 月选举后,国会一个或多个议院的党派控制发生变化,这种分歧可能会对新卫生改革法中的公共卫生部分产生政治影响。因此,为了维持公众对增加支出的支持,至关重要的是要举例说明公共卫生计划的成本节约,并强调它们如何降低了癌症、心脏病和艾滋病等主要慢性疾病的死亡率。