• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外镇痛或患者自控局部镇痛用于根治性前列腺切除术:一项随机、双盲研究。

Thoracic epidural analgesia or patient-controlled local analgesia for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind study.

机构信息

Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistical Unit, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):782-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer296. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aer296
PMID:21948951
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy is moderate to severe. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether intra-abdominal local anaesthetics provide similar analgesia compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA).

METHODS

Fifty patients, ASA I-II, participated in this prospective, double-blinded study. All patients had TEA. After operation, they were randomized into two groups of 25 patients: Group PCLA (patient-controlled local analgesia): self-administration of 10 ml of ropivacaine 2 mg ml⁻¹ via the intra-abdominal catheter for 48 h. Group TEA: infusion of 10 ml h⁻¹ of ropivacaine 1 mg ml⁻¹, fentanyl 2 μg ml⁻¹, and epinephrine 2 μg ml⁻¹ epidurally for 48 h. The primary endpoint was pain on coughing at 4 h after operation. Rescue medication was morphine i.v. as required.

RESULTS

Pain on coughing at 4, 24, and 48 h was significantly lower in Group TEA [0 (0-10)] compared with Group PCLA [4 (0-10)] (P<0.05). Significantly lower pain intensity was also found in Group TEA compared with Group PCLA at the incision site, deep pain, and pain on coughing at 4 and 24 h (P<0.05). Morphine consumption was significantly greater in Group PCLA [12 (0-46)] compared with Group TEA [0 (0-20)] at 0-48 h after operation [median (range)] (P=0.015). Maximum expiratory pressure was higher in Group TEA compared with Group PCLA at 24 h (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

TEA provides superior postoperative pain relief with better preservation of expiratory muscle strength compared with PCLA.

摘要

背景

根治性前列腺切除术(radical retropubic prostatectomy)后会出现中到重度疼痛。本研究的主要目的是评估腹腔内局部麻醉药(intra-abdominal local anaesthetics)与胸硬膜外镇痛(thoracic epidural analgesia,TEA)相比是否具有相似的镇痛效果。

方法

50 名 ASA I-II 级的患者参与了这项前瞻性、双盲研究。所有患者均接受 TEA。手术后,他们被随机分为两组,每组 25 名患者:PCLA 组(患者自控局部镇痛):通过腹腔内导管自行给予 10 ml 2 mg/ml 的罗哌卡因,持续 48 小时。TEA 组:硬膜外输注 10 ml/h 浓度为 1 mg/ml 的罗哌卡因、2 μg/ml 的芬太尼和 2 μg/ml 的肾上腺素,持续 48 小时。主要终点是术后 4 小时咳嗽时的疼痛程度。需要时静脉给予吗啡作为解救药物。

结果

TEA 组咳嗽时的疼痛程度在术后 4、24 和 48 小时显著低于 PCLA 组[0(0-10)比 4(0-10)](P<0.05)。与 PCLA 组相比,TEA 组在切口部位、深部疼痛和术后 4 和 24 小时咳嗽时的疼痛强度也显著较低(P<0.05)。术后 0-48 小时,PCLA 组吗啡用量[12(0-46)]显著大于 TEA 组[0(0-20)](P=0.015)。与 PCLA 组相比,TEA 组在术后 24 小时的最大呼气压力更高(P<0.01)。

结论

与 PCLA 相比,TEA 可提供更优的术后镇痛效果,并更好地保留呼气肌力量。

相似文献

1
Thoracic epidural analgesia or patient-controlled local analgesia for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind study.硬膜外镇痛或患者自控局部镇痛用于根治性前列腺切除术:一项随机、双盲研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):782-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer296. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
2
Postoperative analgesia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a double-blind comparison between low thoracic epidural and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的镇痛:低位胸段硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛的双盲比较。
Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):784-93. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00025.
3
Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline.肾上腺素能显著改善大手术后低剂量布比卡因、芬太尼和肾上腺素输注所产生的胸段硬膜外镇痛效果。一项有或无肾上腺素的随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Sep;42(8):897-909. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05348.x.
4
Comparison of ropivacaine with and without fentanyl vs bupivacaine with fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia in bilateral total knee replacement surgery.比较罗哌卡因联合或不联合芬太尼与布比卡因联合芬太尼用于双侧全膝关节置换术后硬膜外镇痛。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
Epinephrine markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a small-dose infusion of ropivacaine, fentanyl, and epinephrine after major thoracic or abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blinded crossover study with and without epinephrine.肾上腺素显著改善大胸段或腹部手术后小剂量输注罗哌卡因、芬太尼和肾上腺素产生的胸段硬膜外镇痛效果:一项有或无肾上腺素的随机双盲交叉研究。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1598-605, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200206000-00044.
6
Postoperative extradural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. A double-blind comparison between placebo and ropivacaine 10 mg/h or 16 mg/h.吗啡与罗哌卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛。安慰剂与10毫克/小时或16毫克/小时罗哌卡因的双盲对照研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00715.x.
7
The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛和静脉阿片类药物镇痛的镇痛效果比较。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):507-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318297fcee. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
8
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery.右美托咪定与芬太尼作为罗哌卡因辅助剂用于小儿骨科手术术后硬膜外镇痛的比较
Yonsei Med J. 2017 May;58(3):650-657. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.3.650.
9
Lung function after lobectomy: a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil and intravenous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia.肺叶切除术后的肺功能:一项比较胸段硬膜外注射罗哌卡因/舒芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于患者自控镇痛的随机双盲试验。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):238-44. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000266441.58308.42.
10
Effectiveness and safety of continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open gastrectomy.连续伤口浸润用于胃癌根治术后疼痛管理的有效性和安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 7;22(5):1902-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1902.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of spinal anaesthesia on perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain and oncological outcome in radical retropubic prostatectomy-a retrospective before-and-after effectiveness study.脊髓麻醉对耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术围手术期阿片类药物消耗、术后疼痛及肿瘤学结局的影响——一项回顾性前后对照有效性研究
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 3;11(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00281-0.
2
Comparison of analgesic modalities for patients undergoing midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较接受中线剖腹手术的患者的各种镇痛方式:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;69(1):140-176. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02128-6. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
3
Use of Epidural Analgesia as an Adjunct in Elective Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Review of 4983 Cases.
硬膜外镇痛在择期腹壁重建中的应用:4983例病例回顾
Perm J. 2017;21:16-115. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-115.
4
Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?根治性前列腺切除术的最佳疼痛管理:证据是什么?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Nov 4;15:159. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0137-2.
5
Comparison of perioperative outcomes for epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后硬膜外与静脉自控镇痛的围手术期结局比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):239-44. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000219.
6
Anesthetic Challenges in Robotic-assisted Urologic Surgery.机器人辅助泌尿外科手术中的麻醉挑战
Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):178-84.