• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理中预防压疮:一项成本效益分析。

Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Pham Ba', Stern Anita, Chen Wendong, Sander Beate, John-Baptiste Ava, Thein Hla-Hla, Gomes Tara, Wodchis Walter P, Bayoumi Ahmed, Machado Márcio, Carcone Steven, Krahn Murray

机构信息

TorontoHealth Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative,Department of Health Policy Management andEvaluation, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1839-47. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473
PMID:21949031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are common in many care settings, with adverse health outcomes and high treatment costs. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of evidence-based strategies to improve current prevention practice in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

We used a validated Markov model to compare current prevention practice with the following 4 quality improvement strategies: (1) pressure redistribution mattresses for all residents, (2) oral nutritional supplements for high-risk residents with recent weight loss, (3) skin emollients for high-risk residents with dry skin, and (4) foam cleansing for high-risk residents requiring incontinence care. Primary outcomes included lifetime risk of stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs, calculated according to a single health care payer's perspective and expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars (Can$1 = US$0.84).

RESULTS

Strategies cost on average $11.66 per resident per week. They reduced lifetime risk; the associated number needed to treat was 45 (strategy 1), 63 (strategy 4), 158 (strategy 3), and 333 (strategy 2). Strategy 1 and 4 minimally improved QALYs and reduced the mean lifetime cost by $115 and $179 per resident, respectively. The cost per QALY gained was approximately $78 000 for strategy 3 and $7.8 million for strategy 2. If decision makers are willing to pay up to $50 000 for 1 QALY gained, the probability that improving prevention is cost-effective is 94% (strategy 4), 82% (strategy 1), 43% (strategy 3), and 1% (strategy 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and economic evidence supports pressure redistribution mattresses for all long-term care residents. Improving prevention with perineal foam cleansers and dry skin emollients appears to be cost-effective, but firm conclusions are limited by the available clinical evidence.

摘要

背景

压疮在许多护理环境中都很常见,会带来不良健康后果且治疗成本高昂。我们评估了基于证据的策略在长期护理机构中改善当前预防措施的成本效益。

方法

我们使用经过验证的马尔可夫模型,将当前的预防措施与以下4种质量改进策略进行比较:(1)为所有居民使用压力重新分布床垫;(2)为近期体重减轻的高危居民提供口服营养补充剂;(3)为皮肤干燥的高危居民使用皮肤润肤剂;(4)为需要失禁护理的高危居民使用泡沫清洁剂。主要结局包括2至4期压疮的终生风险、质量调整生命年(QALY)和终生成本,这些是根据单一医疗保健支付者的视角计算得出的,并以2009年加拿大元表示(1加元 = 0.84美元)。

结果

这些策略平均每位居民每周花费11.66加元。它们降低了终生风险;相关的治疗所需人数分别为45(策略1)、63(策略4)、158(策略3)和333(策略2)。策略1和4对QALY的改善微乎其微,每位居民的平均终生成本分别降低了115加元和179加元。策略3每获得1个QALY的成本约为78000加元,策略2则为780万加元。如果决策者愿意为获得1个QALY支付高达50000加元,那么改善预防措施具有成本效益的概率分别为94%(策略4)、82%(策略1)、43%(策略3)和1%(策略2)。

结论

临床和经济证据支持为所有长期护理居民使用压力重新分布床垫。使用会阴泡沫清洁剂和干性皮肤润肤剂来改善预防措施似乎具有成本效益,但确切结论受到现有临床证据的限制。

相似文献

1
Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.长期护理中预防压疮:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1839-47. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
2
Early prevention of pressure ulcers among elderly patients admitted through emergency departments: a cost-effectiveness analysis.急诊老年患者压疮的早期预防:成本效益分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):468-78.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program Study: a randomized, controlled prospective comparative value evaluation of 2 pressure ulcer prevention strategies in nursing and rehabilitation centers.压力性溃疡预防计划研究:对护理和康复中心 2 种压力性溃疡预防策略的随机、对照、前瞻性比较价值评估。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Oct;25(10):450-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000421461.21773.32.
4
A comprehensive program to prevent pressure ulcers in long-term care: exploring costs and outcomes.一项预防长期护理中压疮的综合计划:探索成本与结果。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Apr;48(4):52-62.
5
Results of a Markov model analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Korea: the Korean Individual-Microsimulation Model for Cardiovascular Health Interventions.韩国心血管健康干预个体化微观模拟模型评估韩国人群进行心血管疾病一级预防应用他汀类药物治疗的成本效果分析结果
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2919-30; discussion 2916-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.013.
6
Cost-effectiveness of an intensive pressure ulcer prevention protocol in long-term care.长期护理中强化压疮预防方案的成本效益
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Jan-Feb;11(1):22-9.
7
Pressure ulcers: guideline development and economic modelling.压疮:指南制定与经济建模
J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(3):307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03394.x.
8
Lifetime implications and cost-effectiveness of using finasteride to prevent prostate cancer.使用非那雄胺预防前列腺癌的终身影响及成本效益
Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118(8):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.03.001.
9
Economic evaluation of sevelamer in patients with end-stage renal disease.司维拉姆用于终末期肾病患者的经济学评估。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Oct;22(10):2867-78. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm367. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
10
Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.延长依诺肝素治疗以预防初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞。一项成本效益分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0720-3. Epub 2004 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in a Quasi-experimental Design.在准实验设计中评估压力性损伤预防策略的成本效益
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025 Sep 1;38(8):413-417. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000331. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
The Relationship between Nursing Practice Environment and Pressure Ulcer Care Quality in Portugal's Long-Term Care Units.葡萄牙长期护理机构中护理实践环境与压疮护理质量的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;11(12):1751. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121751.
3
An economic analysis of a wearable patient sensor for preventing hospital-acquired pressure injuries among the acutely ill patients.
一种可穿戴式患者传感器预防急性病患者获得性压疮的经济分析。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021 Dec;21(4):457-471. doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09304-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
Effects of a pressure-ulcer audit and feedback regional programme at 1 and 2 years in nursing homes: A prospective longitudinal study.养老院内压疮审核和反馈区域项目对压力性溃疡的影响:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233471. eCollection 2020.
5
Cost-effectiveness of multi-layered silicone foam dressings for prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in high-risk intensive care unit patients: An economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial.多层面硅酮泡沫敷料预防高危重症监护病房患者骶尾部和足跟压疮的成本效果分析:一项随机对照试验的经济学分析。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1291-1299. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13390. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Five-layer border dressings as part of a quality improvement bundle to prevent pressure injuries in US skilled nursing facilities and Australian nursing homes: A cost-effectiveness analysis.五层边界敷料作为质量改进包的一部分,以预防美国熟练护理设施和澳大利亚养老院的压力性损伤:成本效益分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1263-1272. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13174. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
7
Pressure Injury Prevention: Outcomes and Challenges to Use of Resident Monitoring Technology in a Nursing Home.压力性损伤预防:养老院中使用居民监测技术的结果与挑战
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;46(3):207-213. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000523.
8
The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.美国医院获得性压力性损伤的国家成本。
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):634-640. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13071. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Success In Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Tale In Two Data Sets.医院获得性压疮预防的成功:两个数据集的故事。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1787-1796. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0712.
10
Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.医院资源在有效压疮预防中的价值:成本效益分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):132-141. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007505. Epub 2018 Aug 10.