• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care.

作者信息

Park R E, Brook R H, Kosecoff J, Keesey J, Rubenstein L, Keeler E, Kahn K L, Rogers W H, Chassin M R

机构信息

Health Sciences Program, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90406.

出版信息

JAMA. 1990 Jul 25;264(4):484-90.

PMID:2195173
Abstract

We used administrative (Part A Medicare) data to identify a representative sample of 1126 patients with congestive heart failure and 1150 with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with significant unexpectedly high inpatient, age-sex-race-disease-specific death rates ("targeted") vs all other ("untargeted") hospitals in four states. Although death rates in targeted hospitals were 5.0 to 10.9 higher per 100 admissions than in untargeted hospitals, 56% to 82% of the excess could result from purely random variation. Differences in the quality of the process of care (based on a medical record review) could not explain the remaining statistically significant differences in mortality. Comparing targeted hospitals with subsets of untargeted ones, eg, those with lower than expected death rates, did not affect this conclusion. Severity of illness explained up to 2.8 excess deaths per 100 admissions for patients with myocardial infarction. Identifying hospitals that provide poor-quality care based on administrative data and single-year death rates is unlikely; targeting based on time periods greater than 1 year may be better.

摘要

相似文献

1
Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care.
JAMA. 1990 Jul 25;264(4):484-90.
2
Mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to critical access and non-critical access hospitals, 2002-2010.2002-2010 年,医疗保险受益人与入住关键通道和非关键通道医院的死亡率。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2366.
3
Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?“美国最佳医院”在急性心肌梗死治疗方面表现得更好吗?
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):286-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901283400407.
4
Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.替代性绩效薪酬评分方法:对质量改进和患者结局的影响。
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1062-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e54c.
5
Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates.医疗保险医院比较绩效指标与死亡率之间的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2694-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2694.
6
Differences among hospitals in Medicare patient mortality.医疗保险患者死亡率在不同医院之间的差异。
Health Serv Res. 1989 Apr;24(1):1-31.
7
Using admission characteristics to predict short-term mortality from myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.利用入院特征预测老年心肌梗死患者的短期死亡率。合作心血管项目的结果。
JAMA. 1996 May 1;275(17):1322-8.
8
Mortality for publicly reported conditions and overall hospital mortality rates.公开报告疾病的死亡率和医院总死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):1351-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7049.
9
Outcome of myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration patients as compared with medicare patients.退伍军人健康管理局患者与医疗保险患者心肌梗死的结局比较。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 28;343(26):1934-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012283432606.
10
Quality of care by race and gender for congestive heart failure and pneumonia.按种族和性别划分的充血性心力衰竭和肺炎的护理质量。
Med Care. 1999 Dec;37(12):1260-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199912000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
[Experiences of an Initiative Qualitätsmedizin reviewer].[一位主动质量医学评审员的经历]
Urologe A. 2019 Oct;58(10):1150-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-1021-3.
2
Design and reliability of a specific instrument to evaluate patient safety for patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in a predefined care track: a retrospective patient record review study in a single tertiary hospital in the Netherlands.一种用于评估在预定义护理路径下接受治疗的急性心肌梗死患者医疗安全的特定工具的设计与可靠性:荷兰一家三级医院的回顾性患者病历审查研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e014360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014360.
3
Reviewing deaths in British and US hospitals: a study of two scales for assessing preventability.
回顾英美两国医院的死亡情况:一项关于两种可预防性评估量表的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):408-416. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004849. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
One fourth of unplanned transfers to a higher level of care are associated with a highly preventable adverse event: a patient record review in six Belgian hospitals.在比利时六家医院进行的一项患者记录审查发现,四分之一的非计划性转至更高护理级别的情况与高度可预防的不良事件相关。
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1053-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000932.
5
Hospital cardiovascular outcome measures in federal pay-for-reporting and pay-for-performance programs: a brief overview of current efforts.联邦按报告付费和按绩效付费计划中的医院心血管结局指标:当前工作简要概述
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):627-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001364. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
6
Evaluation of the DAVROS (Development And Validation of Risk-adjusted Outcomes for Systems of emergency care) risk-adjustment model as a quality indicator for healthcare.评估 DAVROS(急诊护理系统的开发和验证风险调整结果)风险调整模型作为医疗保健质量指标。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jun;31(6):471-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202359. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
7
Development of an effective risk management system in a teaching hospital.教学医院有效风险管理系统的开发。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012 Sep 21;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2251-6581-11-15.
8
Variations in mortality in children admitted with pneumonia to Kenyan hospitals.肯尼亚医院收治肺炎儿童的死亡率变化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047622. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
9
Case-mix adjusted hospital mortality is a poor proxy for preventable mortality: a modelling study.病例组合调整后的医院死亡率是衡量可预防死亡率的一个较差指标:建模研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1052-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001202. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
10
What is the best way to estimate hospital quality outcomes? A simulation approach.如何最好地评估医院质量结果?一种模拟方法。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug;47(4):1699-718. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01382.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.