University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Oct;21(10):1685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9597-3. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Despite the acknowledged importance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and its proven prognostic benefit, African American men and women simultaneously possess the highest rates of CRC-related incidence and mortality (Swan et al. in Cancer 97(6):1528-1540, 2003) and lowest screening rates in the United States (Polite et al. in Med Clin N Am 89(4):771-793, 2005). Effective, targeted interventions that promote CRC screening for this community are therefore critical. The current study evaluated the impact of a print-based educational intervention on screening behavior and associated patient-based factors, including cancer-related knowledge, fatalism, worry, and decisional balance (pros-cons).
One hundred and eighteen individuals (mean age = 56.08, SD = 5.58) who had not undergone screening were recruited from two health clinics in New York City. Each participant received educational print materials regarding the need for screening, the process of undergoing screening, and the benefits of regular CRC screening.
One in four individuals had undergone post-intervention screening at a three-month follow-up. Whereas all participants reported a decrease in cancer-related worry (p < .05), it was a decrease in fatalism (p < .05) and an increase in decisional balance (p < .05) that was associated with post-intervention screening behavior.
These preliminary results suggest that fatalistic beliefs and an individual's assessment of the benefits and barriers of screening may be critical in the decision to undergo CRC screening. Future interventions to increase CRC-screening rates for this community may be improved by focusing on these patient-based factors.
尽管结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的重要性已得到公认,且其对预后有益已被证实,但非裔美国男性和女性同时拥有美国 CRC 相关发病率和死亡率最高(Swan 等人,Cancer 97(6):1528-1540, 2003)和最低筛查率(Polite 等人,Med Clin N Am 89(4):771-793, 2005)。因此,对于该群体,实施有效且有针对性的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施至关重要。本研究评估了基于印刷的教育干预对筛查行为和相关患者因素的影响,包括癌症相关知识、宿命论、担忧和决策平衡(赞成-反对)。
从纽约市的两家诊所招募了 118 名未接受过筛查的个体(平均年龄 56.08 岁,标准差 5.58)。每位参与者都收到了有关筛查必要性、筛查过程和定期 CRC 筛查益处的教育印刷材料。
四分之一的个体在三个月的随访时进行了干预后的筛查。尽管所有参与者报告癌症相关担忧减少(p<.05),但与干预后筛查行为相关的是宿命论减少(p<.05)和决策平衡增加(p<.05)。
这些初步结果表明,宿命论信念和个体对筛查的益处和障碍的评估可能是决定是否进行 CRC 筛查的关键。未来为提高该群体的 CRC 筛查率而实施的干预措施,可能会通过关注这些患者因素而得到改善。