Suppr超能文献

评估教育干预对非裔美国人社区增加 CRC 筛查率的影响:一项初步研究。

Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

机构信息

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Oct;21(10):1685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9597-3. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the acknowledged importance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and its proven prognostic benefit, African American men and women simultaneously possess the highest rates of CRC-related incidence and mortality (Swan et al. in Cancer 97(6):1528-1540, 2003) and lowest screening rates in the United States (Polite et al. in Med Clin N Am 89(4):771-793, 2005). Effective, targeted interventions that promote CRC screening for this community are therefore critical. The current study evaluated the impact of a print-based educational intervention on screening behavior and associated patient-based factors, including cancer-related knowledge, fatalism, worry, and decisional balance (pros-cons).

METHODS

One hundred and eighteen individuals (mean age = 56.08, SD = 5.58) who had not undergone screening were recruited from two health clinics in New York City. Each participant received educational print materials regarding the need for screening, the process of undergoing screening, and the benefits of regular CRC screening.

RESULTS

One in four individuals had undergone post-intervention screening at a three-month follow-up. Whereas all participants reported a decrease in cancer-related worry (p < .05), it was a decrease in fatalism (p < .05) and an increase in decisional balance (p < .05) that was associated with post-intervention screening behavior.

DISCUSSION

These preliminary results suggest that fatalistic beliefs and an individual's assessment of the benefits and barriers of screening may be critical in the decision to undergo CRC screening. Future interventions to increase CRC-screening rates for this community may be improved by focusing on these patient-based factors.

摘要

背景

尽管结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的重要性已得到公认,且其对预后有益已被证实,但非裔美国男性和女性同时拥有美国 CRC 相关发病率和死亡率最高(Swan 等人,Cancer 97(6):1528-1540, 2003)和最低筛查率(Polite 等人,Med Clin N Am 89(4):771-793, 2005)。因此,对于该群体,实施有效且有针对性的促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施至关重要。本研究评估了基于印刷的教育干预对筛查行为和相关患者因素的影响,包括癌症相关知识、宿命论、担忧和决策平衡(赞成-反对)。

方法

从纽约市的两家诊所招募了 118 名未接受过筛查的个体(平均年龄 56.08 岁,标准差 5.58)。每位参与者都收到了有关筛查必要性、筛查过程和定期 CRC 筛查益处的教育印刷材料。

结果

四分之一的个体在三个月的随访时进行了干预后的筛查。尽管所有参与者报告癌症相关担忧减少(p<.05),但与干预后筛查行为相关的是宿命论减少(p<.05)和决策平衡增加(p<.05)。

讨论

这些初步结果表明,宿命论信念和个体对筛查的益处和障碍的评估可能是决定是否进行 CRC 筛查的关键。未来为提高该群体的 CRC 筛查率而实施的干预措施,可能会通过关注这些患者因素而得到改善。

相似文献

7
Colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors in African Americans.非裔美国人对结直肠癌的认知、看法及行为
Cancer Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;27(3):206-15; quiz 216-7. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200405000-00004.

引用本文的文献

6
The relationship between cancer fatalism and education.癌症宿命论与教育之间的关系。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Feb;32(2):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01363-4. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验