Ayadi Djamila, Etienne Philippe, Burny Franz, Schuind Frédéric
Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Aug;77(4):453-7.
Severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness represents a significant invalidity. Between 1990 and 2005 two surgeons performed open elbow arthrolysis in 30 adult patients (6 women, 24 men, mean age 30.8 years). All cases resulted from severe initial trauma, which had occurred on average 15.5 months previously. Four patients had extrinsic and 18 had mixed contractures; 13 had heterotopic ossifications. Operative complications included two peroperative joint instabilities and 3 transient nerve palsies. Seven elbows were remobilized under anaesthesia, one month after the arthrolysis. Twenty-two patients could be reviewed, on average 56 months after the arthrolysis. Seventy seven percent of the patients were satisfied. At final follow-up, the average arc of flexion-extension was 95 degrees +/- 15 degrees (average flexion 120 degrees +/- 13 degrees, average flexion contracture 31 degrees +/- 6 degrees), with a mean improvement of 51 degrees relative to the preoperative range (p < 0.001). The average arc of forearm rotation at final follow-up was 151 degrees +/- 23 degrees, with a mean improvement of 41 degrees (p < 0.05). No patient suffered persistent weakness or instability. The average VAS was 5/10, the average MEPI score 76, with 6 excellent, 6 good, 6 fair and 4 poor results, mainly because of persisting pain. The average DASH score was 31.6 and the average SF-36 was 66. Significant correlations were observed between VAS and DASH, MEPI and SF-36. This series demonstrates that open arthrolysis may restore acceptable elbow motion in young active patients presenting with elbow stiffness following major trauma. However, full restoration of motion is rare; only 18% of the patients regained the functional arcs of motion reported by Morrey, but the majority were satisfied, given their preoperative degree of elbow stiffness. The ultimate result from both the patient's and the surgeon's perspectives is strongly dependent on persisting pain, which was frequent in this series and influenced the DASH, MEPI and the SF-36 scores. Arthrolysis did not address the issue, if pain was the chief complaint.
严重创伤后肘关节僵硬是一种严重的功能障碍。1990年至2005年间,两名外科医生对30例成年患者(6名女性,24名男性,平均年龄30.8岁)实施了开放性肘关节松解术。所有病例均由严重的初始创伤所致,创伤平均发生在术前15.5个月。4例为外在性挛缩,18例为混合性挛缩;13例有异位骨化。手术并发症包括2例术中关节不稳定和3例短暂性神经麻痹。7例肘关节在松解术后1个月于麻醉下进行了再活动。22例患者获得随访,平均随访时间为松解术后56个月。77%的患者表示满意。末次随访时,屈伸平均活动度为95°±15°(平均屈曲120°±13°,平均屈曲挛缩31°±6°),相对于术前活动度平均改善51°(p<0.001)。末次随访时前臂旋转平均活动度为151°±23°,平均改善41°(p<0.05)。无患者出现持续性无力或不稳定。视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均为5/10,肘关节功能评分(MEPI)平均为76分,其中优6例,良6例,可6例,差4例,主要原因是存在持续性疼痛。上肢功能障碍评分(DASH)平均为31.6分,36项简短健康调查量表(SF-36)平均为66分。观察到VAS与DASH、MEPI与SF-36之间存在显著相关性。该系列研究表明,对于因严重创伤导致肘关节僵硬的年轻活跃患者,开放性松解术可恢复可接受的肘关节活动度。然而,很少能完全恢复活动度;只有18%的患者恢复到了Morrey报道的功能活动弧度,但考虑到术前肘关节僵硬程度,大多数患者还是满意的。从患者和外科医生的角度来看,最终结果很大程度上取决于持续性疼痛,本系列研究中持续性疼痛很常见,并影响了DASH、MEPI和SF-36评分。如果疼痛是主要诉求,松解术无法解决这一问题。