Suppr超能文献

手术松解僵硬的肘部关节:系统评价。

Surgical arthrolysis of the stiff elbow: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2383-2393. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04442-0. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Stiffness after elbow injuries can severely limit daily life. If adequate conservative treatment does not result in satisfactory improvement of elbow function, surgical intervention should be considered. Whether an open or arthroscopic procedure is preferable is still a topic of debate and a systematic review of functional outcomes is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE, for studies published between 2013 and 2021. Primary objective was to compare open and arthroscopic arthrolysis' functional outcomes, respectively, especially ROM and MEPS, as well as the accompanied complications. The PRISMA guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

27 studies comprising 1666 patients were included. 1059 patients (63.6%) were treated with open arthrolysis, and 607 patients (36.4%) were treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis. The results presented indicate satisfactory outcomes in open and arthroscopic arthrolysis with regard to functional outcome parameters. Treatment success, defined as excellent or good results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, among the patients treated with an open procedure was 88.8%; 6.3% required revision whereas 18.1% had complications without the need for revision surgery. Within the cohort of arthroscopically treated patients, treatment success was 91.8%. Revisions and complications without further surgical intervention were significantly less frequent than in the open cohort, at 1.6% and 9.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both open and arthroscopic arthrolysis provide good to excellent functional outcomes. Since the number of complications and revision increases with the invasiveness of the treatment, an arthroscopic procedure might be favored if feasible by indication. The role of forearm rotation and the use of a hinged external fixator remains of interest.

STUDY DESIGN

Level IV; Systematic review.

摘要

简介

肘部受伤后僵硬会严重限制日常生活。如果充分的保守治疗不能显著改善肘部功能,就应考虑手术干预。究竟是选择开放式手术还是关节镜下手术,目前仍存在争议,且缺乏对功能结局的系统评价。

材料与方法

我们系统地检索了 2013 年至 2021 年间发表的电子数据库,包括 MEDLINE 使用 PubMed 界面和 EMBASE,以寻找相关文献。主要目的是比较开放式和关节镜下松解术的功能结局,特别是关节活动度和 MEPS,以及伴随的并发症。本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。

结果

共纳入 27 项研究,包含 1666 例患者。其中 1059 例(63.6%)患者接受了开放式松解术,607 例(36.4%)患者接受了关节镜下松解术。研究结果表明,开放式和关节镜下松解术在功能结局参数方面均取得了满意的效果。根据 Mayo 肘部功能评分,接受开放式手术的患者中,治疗成功率(定义为优或良)为 88.8%;需要翻修的比例为 6.3%,并发症但无需翻修的比例为 18.1%。在关节镜治疗组中,治疗成功率为 91.8%。无需进一步手术干预的翻修和并发症的比例明显低于开放式松解组,分别为 1.6%和 9.1%。

结论

无论是开放式还是关节镜下松解术,都能获得良好到优秀的功能结局。鉴于治疗的侵袭性越大,并发症和翻修的数量就会增加,如果符合适应证,关节镜手术可能更受青睐。前臂旋转的作用和使用铰链式外固定器仍然值得关注。

研究设计

IV 级;系统评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/10110632/a8636f45c4df/402_2022_4442_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验