Brown J, Brown M W
University of Bristol, U.K.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 May;42(2):279-90. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401222.
In two experiments, a recognition test for an earlier presented list was given twice in immediate succession (Test 1 and Test 2). On the hypothesis that anterograde amnesia for episodic memory involves a deficit in contextual memory, amnesic subjects should confuse familiarity with distractor items gained during Test 1 with familiarity gained during original list presentation. As a result, they should think that they recognize more items on Test 2. This will lower recognition efficiency in Test 2 by increasing false alarms rather than by reducing hits. For subjects with an amnesia induced by lorazepam, but not for control subjects, recognition efficiency was substantially reduced in Test 2 in both experiments. As predicted, this impairment was due to a large increase in false alarms, with no decrease in the number of hits. The impairment could not be explained by a difference in recognition level between lorazepam and control subjects on Test 1. These findings therefore support the contextual memory deficit hypothesis of anterograde amnesia. Their implications for understanding the relationship between recall and recognition in amnesia are discussed.
在两项实验中,对先前呈现的列表进行了连续两次即时识别测试(测试1和测试2)。基于情景记忆的顺行性遗忘涉及情境记忆缺陷这一假设,失忆受试者会将测试1期间获得的对干扰项的熟悉感与原始列表呈现期间获得的熟悉感相混淆。结果,他们会认为自己在测试2中识别出了更多项目。这将通过增加误报而非减少命中次数来降低测试2中的识别效率。在两项实验中,对于由劳拉西泮诱发失忆的受试者,而非对照受试者,测试2中的识别效率大幅降低。正如预测的那样,这种损害是由于误报大幅增加,而命中次数并未减少。这种损害无法用测试1中劳拉西泮组和对照组受试者在识别水平上的差异来解释。因此,这些发现支持了顺行性遗忘的情境记忆缺陷假说。并讨论了它们对于理解失忆中回忆与识别之间关系的意义。