• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者伤害索赔能否用作质量指标?

Can patient injury claims be utilised as a quality indicator?

机构信息

Centre for Health and Social Economics CHESS, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.08.012
PMID:21956047
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between patient injury claims and well-known quality indicators and to assess whether claims can be utilised in performance measurement.

METHODS

Data were derived from administrative registers and comprised hip and knee replacement patients (n=34181) in Finland from 1998 to 2003. Hospital-level correlations were calculated between claims and quality indicators (5-year revision rate, 1-year deep infection rate, and 14-day readmission rate), while logistic regression analysis was used to analyze patient-level data for an association between claims and quality indicators.

RESULTS

Correlations between claims and revisions as well as claims and infections were statistically significant, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.21 to 0.62. In the regression analysis, both the revision and the infection indicator had a positive and statistically significant association with filing a claim (OR 1.002; 95% CI 1.001-1.003 and 1.001; 1.00005-1.001, respectively) and obtaining compensation (1.003; 1.001-1.005 and 1.001; 1.0003-1.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A claims indicator has the potential to be applied as a quality indicator. It should be complemented, however, with other indicators or actions to improve its acceptability by health professionals and to mitigate its possible undesirable effects.

摘要

目的

研究患者伤害索赔与知名质量指标之间的关联性,并评估索赔是否可用于绩效评估。

方法

数据来源于芬兰 1998 年至 2003 年间的髋关节和膝关节置换患者的行政登记册(n=34181)。计算了医院层面索赔与质量指标(5 年修订率、1 年深部感染率和 14 天再入院率)之间的相关性,同时使用逻辑回归分析患者层面数据,以分析索赔与质量指标之间的关联。

结果

索赔与修订以及索赔与感染之间的相关性具有统计学意义,相关系数范围为 0.21 至 0.62。在回归分析中,修订和感染指标均与提出索赔(OR 1.002;95%CI 1.001-1.003 和 1.001;1.00005-1.001)和获得赔偿(1.003;1.001-1.005 和 1.001;1.0003-1.002)具有正相关且具有统计学意义。

结论

索赔指标具有作为质量指标的应用潜力。然而,它应辅以其他指标或行动,以提高其被卫生专业人员接受的程度,并减轻其可能产生的不良影响。

相似文献

1
Can patient injury claims be utilised as a quality indicator?患者伤害索赔能否用作质量指标?
Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
2
Factors predisposing to claims and compensations for patient injuries following total hip and knee arthroplasty.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后导致患者伤害赔偿的相关因素。
Acta Orthop. 2012 Apr;83(2):190-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.672089. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
3
Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼中的索赔、失误及赔偿金支付
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2024-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054479.
4
Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden.对来自瑞典一个非侵权、无过错的全国性患者保险系统的23364份患者发起、医生审核的医疗事故索赔进行分析:经验教训
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Aug;17(4):259-63. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022897.
5
Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden.对来自瑞典非侵权、无责备的全国性患者保险系统的23364份患者发起、医生审核的医疗事故索赔进行分析:经验教训
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Feb;85(1000):69-73. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022897.
6
Medical malpractice in hip and knee arthroplasty.髋关节和膝关节置换术中的医疗过失
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
7
Litigation after hip and knee replacement in the National Health Service.国家医疗服务体系中髋关节和膝关节置换术后的诉讼。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95-B(1):122-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.30908.
8
Lawsuits After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Malpractice Claims Analysis.初次及翻修全髋关节置换术后的诉讼:医疗事故索赔分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):2958-2962. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.044. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Hip Arthroplasty Malpractice Claims in the Netherlands: Closed Claim Study 2000-2012.荷兰髋关节置换术医疗事故索赔:2000 - 2012年结案索赔研究
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1890-1893.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.055. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.类风湿性关节炎患者与骨关节炎患者初次全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后感染的翻修风险:来自挪威关节置换登记处的 108786 例髋关节和膝关节置换术的前瞻性、基于人群的研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Apr;62(4):473-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20036.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetric claims in Finland 2012-2022-A nationwide patient insurance registry study.芬兰 2012-2022 年的产科索赔:一项全国性的患者保险登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jul;103(7):1377-1385. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14869. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Patient injury claims for posterior cruciate ligament injury: a nationwide registry study in Finland.患者后交叉韧带损伤索赔:芬兰全国登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Aug 16;94:426-431. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.18265.
3
Patterns of malpractice claims and compensation after surgical procedures: a retrospective analysis of 8,901 claims from the Finnish patient insurance registry.
外科手术后医疗事故索赔与赔偿模式:对芬兰患者保险登记处8901起索赔的回顾性分析
Patient Saf Surg. 2023 Feb 10;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00353-0.
4
Rating Hospital Performance in China: Review of Publicly Available Measures and Development of a Ranking System.中国医院绩效评价:现有公开评价指标评价与排名体系构建。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 17;23(6):e17095. doi: 10.2196/17095.
5
Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality.各自为政:为何欧洲各地的监管机构使用不同指标来衡量医疗质量。
Health Policy. 2020 May;124(5):501-510. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
6
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-related patient injuries: a nationwide registry study in Finland.前交叉韧带重建相关的患者损伤:芬兰全国注册研究。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Dec;90(6):596-601. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1678233. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
How physicians make sense of their experience of being involved in hospital users' complaints and the associated mediation.医生如何理解他们参与医院用户投诉及相关调解的经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3905-8.
8
Records of medical malpractice litigation: a potential indicator of health-care quality in China.医疗事故诉讼记录:中国医疗质量的一个潜在指标。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jun 1;95(6):430-436. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179143. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
9
Comparison of Health Care Costs Between Claimants and Nonclaimants in the No-Fault Compensation System of Finland.芬兰无过错赔偿制度中索赔人与非索赔人医疗费用的比较。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):121-127. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000252.
10
The Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning.医疗投诉分析工具:一种用于服务监测和组织学习的方法的开发与可靠性测试
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):937-946. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004596. Epub 2016 Jan 6.