Isik Kubilay, Kalayci Abdullah, Durmus Ercan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, 06490, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:575874. doi: 10.1155/2011/575874. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Objective. Recently, some authors reported that maxillary teeth could be extracted without using palatal anesthesia, but they did not clearly specify the extracted teeth. This is important, because apparently the local anesthetic solution infiltrates the maxilla and achieves a sufficient anesthesia in the palatal side. Thus, thickness of the bone may affect the depth of anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the depth of anesthesia in different parts of the maxilla when only a buccal infiltration anesthesia was done. Patients and Method. The maxilla was divided into anterior, premolar, and molar regions. In each region, 15 teeth were extracted with a single buccal infiltration. The patient marked the pain level on a numerical rating scale. Results. Anesthesia depth was sufficient and was not significantly different (P > 0.05) among three maxillary regions. Conclusion. Except for surgical interventions, all maxillary teeth can be extracted using only a buccal infiltration anesthesia.
目的。最近,一些作者报道上颌牙齿可以在不使用腭侧麻醉的情况下拔除,但他们没有明确指出所拔除的牙齿。这一点很重要,因为局部麻醉溶液显然会渗透到上颌骨并在上腭侧实现充分麻醉。因此,骨的厚度可能会影响麻醉深度。本研究的目的是比较仅进行颊侧浸润麻醉时上颌不同部位的麻醉深度。患者与方法。上颌骨被分为前部、前磨牙区和磨牙区。在每个区域,通过单次颊侧浸润拔除15颗牙齿。患者在数字评分量表上标记疼痛程度。结果。麻醉深度足够,上颌三个区域之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论。除手术干预外,所有上颌牙齿都可以仅使用颊侧浸润麻醉拔除。