Ahad Abdul, Haque Ekramul, Naaz Sabiha, Bey Afshan, Rahman Sajjad Abdur
Department of Dentistry, Medini Rai Medical College, Palamu, Jharkhand, India.
Department of Periodontics, Dr. Ziauddin Ahmad Dental College, Faculty of Medicine, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, India.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):387-395. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.387. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
The anterior-middle superior alveolar (AMSA) anesthetic technique has been reported to be a less traumatic alternative to several conventional nerve blocks and local infiltration for anesthesia of the maxillary teeth, their periodontium, and the palate. However, its anatomic basis remains controversial. The present study aimed to determine if the pattern of cortical and cancellous bone density in the maxillary premolar region can provide a rationale for the success of the AMSA anesthetic technique.
Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 66 maxillary quadrants from 34 patients (16 men and 18 women) were evaluated using a volumetric imaging software for cortical and cancellous bone densities in three interdental regions between the canine and first molar. Bone density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU) separately for the buccal cortical, palatal cortical, buccal cancellous, and palatal cancellous bones. Mean HU values were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analysis.
Cancellous bone density was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.001) in the palatal half than in the buccal half across all three interdental regions. However, there was no significant difference (P = 0.106) between the buccal and palatal cortical bone densities at the site of AMSA injection. No significant difference was observed between the two genders for any of the evaluated parameters.
The palatal half of the cancellous bone had a significantly lower density than the buccal half, which could be a reason for the effective diffusion of the anesthetic solution following a palatal injection during the AMSA anesthetic technique.
据报道,上前中牙槽(AMSA)麻醉技术是一种对上颌牙、牙周组织及腭部进行麻醉的方法,相较于几种传统的神经阻滞和局部浸润麻醉,它的创伤性较小。然而,其解剖学基础仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定上颌前磨牙区皮质骨和松质骨密度模式是否能为AMSA麻醉技术的成功提供理论依据。
使用容积成像软件对34例患者(16例男性和18例女性)的66个上颌象限进行锥形束计算机断层扫描,评估犬齿和第一磨牙之间三个牙间区域的皮质骨和松质骨密度。分别以亨氏单位(HU)测量颊侧皮质骨、腭侧皮质骨、颊侧松质骨和腭侧松质骨的骨密度。采用曼-惠特尼U检验和单因素方差分析及事后分析比较平均HU值。
在所有三个牙间区域,腭侧半侧的松质骨密度均显著低于颊侧半侧(P≤0.001)。然而,在AMSA注射部位,颊侧和腭侧皮质骨密度之间没有显著差异(P = 0.106)。在任何评估参数中,两性之间均未观察到显著差异。
松质骨的腭侧半侧密度明显低于颊侧半侧,这可能是AMSA麻醉技术中腭部注射后麻醉溶液有效扩散的原因。