• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历:前进之路。

Electronic medical records: a path forward.

作者信息

Bernd David L, Fine Peter S

机构信息

Sentara Healthcare, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Front Health Serv Manage. 2011 Fall;28(1):3-13.

PMID:21961380
Abstract

Health systems are moving to implement comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) systems, or significant pieces of them, in the belief that EMR can be integrated into clinical practice and lead to improved patient outcomes and enhanced safety. There are substantial roadblocks to implementing EMR, including significant cost, the competency needed to implement, the political environment, organization infrastructure and culture, and how organization leaders understand return on investment. Complicating factors include the drive to implement EMR to meet meaningful use standards to qualify for a federal incentive program and recently publicized studies that question the value equation of the EMR as it relates to patient care improvements. We offer our experiences on the successful implementation of the EMR across the large health systems we lead. We offer practical advice and tips on how to achieve successful implementation, evidence that successful implementations improve patient care and safety, and a glimpse of how EMR is a significant foundation in a future of collaborative models that provide continuum-based care.

摘要

卫生系统正在着手实施全面的电子病历(EMR)系统或其中的重要部分,因为他们相信电子病历能够融入临床实践,进而改善患者治疗效果并提高安全性。实施电子病历存在诸多障碍,包括高昂的成本、实施所需的能力、政治环境、组织基础设施和文化,以及组织领导者对投资回报率的理解。复杂因素还包括为符合联邦激励计划资格而推动实施电子病历以满足有意义使用标准,以及最近公布的一些研究,这些研究对电子病历与改善患者护理相关的价值等式提出了质疑。我们分享在我们所领导的大型卫生系统中成功实施电子病历的经验。我们提供关于如何实现成功实施的实用建议和提示、成功实施可改善患者护理和安全的证据,以及对电子病历如何成为未来提供基于连续护理的协作模式的重要基础的一瞥。

相似文献

1
Electronic medical records: a path forward.电子病历:前进之路。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2011 Fall;28(1):3-13.
2
Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.电子健康记录系统以及基层医疗医生诊所申请有意义使用激励措施的意向:美国,2001 - 2011年
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Nov(79):1-8.
3
What meaningful use means now.
Health Data Manag. 2010 Sep;18(9):18, 20, 22 passim.
4
Overcoming barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: A comparative study.克服美国医疗体系中电子病历(EMR)实施的障碍:一项比较研究。
Health Informatics J. 2010 Dec;16(4):306-18. doi: 10.1177/1460458210380523.
5
Financial incentive programs for EHRs.电子健康记录的财务激励计划。
Med Econ. 2011 Oct 25;88(20):48-9, 53.
6
The financial and nonfinancial costs of implementing electronic health records in primary care practices.实施电子健康记录在初级保健实践中的财务和非财务成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):481-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0768.
7
Development of a draft pan-Canadian primary health care electronic medical record content standard.制定一份泛加拿大初级卫生保健电子病历内容标准草案。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;164:385-91.
8
Market factors and electronic medical record adoption in medical practices.医疗实践中的市场因素与电子病历采纳。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Jan-Mar;37(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182352562.
9
Hospital IT adoption strategies associated with implementation success: implications for achieving meaningful use.与实施成功相关的医院 IT 采用策略:实现有意义使用的意义。
J Healthc Manag. 2010 May-Jun;55(3):175-88; discussion 188-9.
10
Strategy and governance for successful implementation of an enterprise-wide ambulatory EMR.在企业范围内成功实施门诊电子病历的策略与管理
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2010 Spring;24(2):34-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.注意差距。一项旨在识别电子健康记录实施过程中的可用性和安全性挑战及实践的系统综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 16;7(4):1069-1087. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105.
2
Proficiency in identifying, managing and communicating medical errors: feasibility and validity study assessing two core competencies.识别、管理和沟通医疗差错的能力:评估两项核心能力的可行性和有效性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0755-5.
3
Typed versus voice recognition for data entry in electronic health records: emergency physician time use and interruptions.
电子健康记录中数据录入的打字录入与语音识别:急诊医师的时间使用情况及干扰因素
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;15(4):541-7. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.3.19658.