Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚利益分享在卫生研究中的概念:利益攸关方的理解——一项定性研究。

Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Kemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine, Nairobi Unit, P,O Box 43640, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Oct 3;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of benefit sharing to enhance the social value of global health research in resource poor settings is now a key strategy for addressing moral issues of relevance to individuals, communities and host countries in resource poor settings when they participate in international collaborative health research.The influence of benefit sharing framework on the conduct of collaborative health research is for instance evidenced by the number of publications and research ethics guidelines that require prior engagement between stakeholders to determine the social value of research to the host communities. While such efforts as the production of international guidance on how to promote the social value of research through such strategies as benefit sharing have been made, the extent to which these ideas and guidelines have been absorbed by those engaged in global health research especially in resource poor settings remains unclear. We examine this awareness among stakeholders involved in health related research in Kenya.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with key informants drawn from within the broader health research system in Kenya including researchers from the mainstream health research institutions, networks and universities, teaching hospitals, policy makers, institutional review boards, civil society organisations and community representative groups.

RESULTS

Our study suggests that although people have a sense of justice and the moral aspects of research, this was not articulated in terms used in the literature and the guidelines on the ethics of global health research.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that while in theory several efforts can be made to address the moral issues of concern to research participants and their communities in resource poor settings, quick fixes such as benefit sharing are not going to be straightforward. We suggest a need to pay closer attention to the processes through which ethical principles are enacted in practice and distil lessons on how best to involve individuals and communities in promoting ethical conduct of global health research in resource poor settings.

摘要

背景

在资源匮乏环境中,为增强全球健康研究的社会价值,利益共享的理念现已成为应对与个体、社区和东道国相关的道德问题的关键策略,当这些个体、社区和东道国参与国际合作健康研究时。利益共享框架对合作健康研究开展的影响,例如,体现在大量要求利益攸关方之间预先进行接触,以确定研究对东道国社区的社会价值的出版物和研究伦理准则中。虽然已经制定了国际指导方针,说明如何通过利益共享等策略来促进研究的社会价值,但这些理念和准则在多大程度上被参与全球健康研究(尤其是资源匮乏环境中的全球健康研究)的人员所吸收,情况尚不清楚。我们检查了肯尼亚与健康相关研究中的利益攸关方对这些意识的了解程度。

方法

我们对肯尼亚更广泛的健康研究系统中的关键信息提供者进行了深入访谈,包括来自主流健康研究机构、网络和大学、教学医院、政策制定者、机构审查委员会、民间社会组织和社区代表群体的研究人员。

结果

我们的研究表明,尽管人们对正义和研究的道德方面有一定的认识,但这种认识并没有以文献和全球健康研究伦理准则中使用的术语来表达。

结论

这项研究表明,尽管从理论上讲,可以做出几种努力来解决资源匮乏环境中研究参与者及其社区关注的道德问题,但利益共享等权宜之计并不简单。我们建议需要更加关注在实践中实施伦理原则的过程,并汲取关于如何最好地让个人和社区参与促进资源匮乏环境中全球健康研究的伦理行为的经验教训。

相似文献

3
What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Jun;13(2):281-93. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9706-4. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Viewing benefit sharing in global health research through the lens of Aristotelian justice.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;43(6):417-421. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102858. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Human rights, cultural pluralism, and international health research.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(6):529-57. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-2199-5.

引用本文的文献

1
3
The Role of Inclusion Benefits in Ethics Committee Assessment of Research Studies.
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 May;41(3):13-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500015.
6
Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 18;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0315-z.
7
The Significance of Benefit Perceptions for the Ethics of HIV Research Involving Adolescents in Kenya.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Oct;12(4):269-279. doi: 10.1177/1556264617721556. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
Beyond procedural ethics: foregrounding questions of justice in global health research ethics training for students.
Glob Public Health. 2013 Jul;8(6):713-24. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.796400. Epub 2013 May 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Responsibilities in international research: a new look revisited.
J Med Ethics. 2010 Apr;36(4):194-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032672.
4
Ethical issues in medical research in the developing world: a report on a meeting organised by Fondation Mérieux.
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Aug;9(2):88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2008.00229.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
5
Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory.
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1137-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308450.
6
Researchers' ethical duties are not to be outsourced.
Nature. 2007 Sep 13;449(7159):139. doi: 10.1038/449139c.
7
Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries.
PLoS Med. 2007 Sep;4(9):e273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273.
8
Ethical issues in research in low-income countries.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Jun;11(6):617-23.
9
Sharing the benefits of genetic resources: from biodiversity to human genetics.
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 Dec;6(3):135-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00148.x.
10
Responsibility for global health.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(1):95-114. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-5755-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验