Suppr超能文献

一种基于网络的脑损伤后沟通训练服务提供模式:一项混合方法、前瞻性、混合型2实施-效果研究的方案

A Web-Based Service Delivery Model for Communication Training After Brain Injury: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Prospective, Hybrid Type 2 Implementation-Effectiveness Study.

作者信息

Miao Melissa, Power Emma, Rietdijk Rachael, Brunner Melissa, Debono Deborah, Togher Leanne

机构信息

University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 9;10(12):e31995. doi: 10.2196/31995.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acquired brain injuries (ABIs) commonly cause cognitive-communication disorders, which can have a pervasive psychosocial impact on a person's life. More than 135 million people worldwide currently live with ABI, and this large and growing burden is increasingly surpassing global rehabilitation service capacity. A web-based service delivery model may offer a scalable solution. The Social Brain Toolkit is an evidence-based suite of 3 web-based communication training interventions for people with ABI and their communication partners. Successful real-world delivery of web-based interventions such as the Social Brain Toolkit requires investigation of intervention implementation in addition to efficacy and effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the implementation and effectiveness of the Social Brain Toolkit as a web-based service delivery model.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods, prospective, hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study, theoretically underpinned by the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework of digital health implementation. We will document implementation strategies preemptively deployed to support the launch of the Social Brain Toolkit interventions, as well as implementation strategies identified by end users through formative evaluation of the Social Brain Toolkit. We will prospectively observe implementation outcomes, selected on the basis of the NASSS framework, through quantitative web analytics of intervention use, qualitative and quantitative pre- and postintervention survey data from all users within a specified sample frame, and qualitative interviews with a subset of users of each intervention. Qualitative implementation data will be deductively analyzed against the NASSS framework. Quantitative implementation data will be analyzed descriptively. We will obtain effectiveness outcomes through web-based knowledge tests, custom user questionnaires, and formal clinical tools. Quantitative effectiveness outcomes will be analyzed through descriptive statistics and the Reliable Change Index, with repeated analysis of variance (pretraining, posttraining, and follow-up), to determine whether there is any significant improvement within this participant sample.

RESULTS

Data collection commenced on July 2, 2021, and is expected to conclude on June 1, 2022, after a 6-month sample frame of analytics for each Social Brain Toolkit intervention. Data analysis will occur concurrently with data collection until mid-2022, with results expected for publication late 2022 and early 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

End-user evaluation of the Social Brain Toolkit's implementation can guide intervention development and implementation to reach and meet community needs in a feasible, scalable, sustainable, and acceptable manner. End user feedback will be directly incorporated and addressed wherever possible in the next version of the Social Brain Toolkit. Learnings from these findings will benefit the implementation of this and future web-based psychosocial interventions for people with ABI and other populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001170819; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001170819, Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001177842; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001177842, Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001180808; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001180808.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/31995.

摘要

背景

后天性脑损伤(ABI)通常会导致认知交流障碍,这可能会对一个人的生活产生广泛的心理社会影响。目前全球有超过1.35亿人患有ABI,而且这一庞大且不断增加的负担正日益超出全球康复服务能力。基于网络的服务提供模式可能提供一种可扩展的解决方案。社交大脑工具包是一套基于证据的网络通信培训干预措施,针对患有ABI的人和他们的交流伙伴。除了有效性和效果之外,成功在现实世界中提供基于网络的干预措施(如社交大脑工具包)还需要对干预措施的实施情况进行调查。

目的

本研究的目的是调查社交大脑工具包作为一种基于网络的服务提供模式的实施情况和有效性。

方法

这是一项混合方法、前瞻性、混合型2实施-有效性研究,理论基础是数字健康实施的未采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性(NASSS)框架。我们将记录预先部署的支持社交大脑工具包干预措施推出的实施策略,以及最终用户通过对社交大脑工具包的形成性评估确定的实施策略。我们将前瞻性地观察基于NASSS框架选择的实施结果,通过对干预措施使用情况的定量网络分析、来自指定样本框架内所有用户的定性和定量干预前后调查数据,以及对每个干预措施的一部分用户进行定性访谈。定性实施数据将根据NASSS框架进行演绎分析。定量实施数据将进行描述性分析。我们将通过基于网络的知识测试、定制用户问卷和正式临床工具获得有效性结果。定量有效性结果将通过描述性统计和可靠变化指数进行分析,并进行重复方差分析(训练前、训练后和随访),以确定该参与者样本中是否有任何显著改善。

结果

数据收集于2021年7月2日开始,预计在对每个社交大脑工具包干预措施进行6个月的分析样本框架后,于2022年6月1日结束。数据分析将与数据收集同时进行,直到2022年年中,预计结果将在2022年底和2023年初发表。

结论

对社交大脑工具包实施情况的最终用户评估可以指导干预措施的开发和实施,以一种可行、可扩展、可持续和可接受的方式满足社区需求。最终用户的反馈将在社交大脑工具包的下一版本中尽可能直接纳入并得到解决。从这些发现中获得的经验将有利于为患有ABI的人和其他人群实施这一以及未来基于网络的心理社会干预措施。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12621001170819;https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001170819,澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12621001177842;https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001177842,澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12621001180808;https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621001180808。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/31995。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Implementation of online psychosocial interventions for people with neurological conditions and their caregivers: A systematic review protocol.
Digit Health. 2021 Sep 6;7:20552076211035988. doi: 10.1177/20552076211035988. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID‑19 pandemic.
Health Technol (Berl). 2021;11(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s12553-020-00516-4. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 4;22(3):e15509. doi: 10.2196/15509.
9
The Association Between Community Participation and Social Internet Use Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):254-261. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000566.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验