Integrated Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS1167.
Intraoperative imaging often does not provide adequate visualization to ensure safe placement of screws. Therefore, the authors investigated the accuracy of a freehand technique for placement of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar screws in C-2.
Sixteen cadaveric specimens were instrumented freehand by 2 experienced cervical spine surgeons with either a pars or pedicle screw, and bilateral intralaminar screws. The technique was based on anatomical starting points and published screw trajectories. A pedicle finder was used to establish the trajectory, followed by tapping, palpation, and screw placement. After placement of all screws (16 pars screws, 16 pedicle screws, and 32 intralaminar screws), the C-2 segments were disarticulated, radiographed in anteroposterior, lateral, and axial planes, and meticulously inspected by another spine surgeon to determine the nature and presence of any defects.
A total of 64 screws were evaluated in this study. Pars screws exhibited 2 critical defects (1 in the foramen transversarium and 1 in the C2-3 facet) and an insignificant dorsal cortex breech, for an overall accuracy rate of 81.3%. Pedicle screws demonstrated only 1 insignificant violation (inferior facet/medial cortex intrusion of 1 mm) with an accuracy rate of 93.8%, and intralaminar screws demonstrated 3 insignificant violations (2 in the ventral canal, 1 in the caudad lamina breech) for an accuracy rate of 90.6%. Pars screws had significantly more critical violations than intralaminar screws (p = 0.041).
Instrumentation of the C-2 vertebrae using the freehand technique for insertion of pedicle and intralaminar screws showed a high success rate with no critical violations. Pars screw insertion was not as reliable, with 2 critical violations from a total of 16 placements. The freehand technique appears to be a safe and reliable method for insertion of C-2 pedicle and intralaminar screws.
术中影像学检查常不能提供充分的可视化效果,难以确保螺钉安全植入。因此,作者研究了徒手技术在 C-2 椎弓根、椎板和关节突内螺钉置入中的准确性。
由 2 名经验丰富的颈椎外科医生使用椎弓根或椎板螺钉和双侧关节突内螺钉对 16 具尸体标本进行徒手置钉。该技术基于解剖学起始点和已发表的螺钉轨迹。使用椎弓根探子确定轨迹,然后进行攻丝、触诊和螺钉置入。在所有螺钉(16 枚椎弓根螺钉、16 枚椎板螺钉和 32 枚关节突内螺钉)置入后,将 C-2 节段分离,在前后位、侧位和轴位进行放射摄影,并由另一位脊柱外科医生进行仔细检查,以确定任何缺陷的性质和存在情况。
本研究共评估了 64 枚螺钉。椎板螺钉出现 2 处临界缺陷(1 处穿过横突孔,1 处穿过 C2-3 关节突)和 1 处不明显的背侧皮质突破,总体准确率为 81.3%。椎弓根螺钉仅出现 1 处不明显的侵犯(下关节突/内侧皮质侵入 1mm),准确率为 93.8%,关节突内螺钉出现 3 处不明显的侵犯(2 处位于腹侧椎管,1 处位于尾侧椎板突破),准确率为 90.6%。椎板螺钉的临界侵犯明显多于关节突内螺钉(p=0.041)。
使用徒手技术置入 C-2 椎弓根和关节突内螺钉进行 C-2 椎体置钉,成功率高,无临界侵犯。椎板螺钉置入的可靠性较差,16 枚螺钉中有 2 枚出现临界侵犯。徒手技术似乎是一种安全可靠的 C-2 椎弓根和关节突内螺钉置入方法。