Institute for Behavioural Reseach, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):783-9. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
The Time Trade-Off (TTO) is an instrument used for valuing health-related quality of life. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of a computer TTO in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compared the computer with the interview TTO regarding feasibility and agreement.
In study 1 using a cross-over design, thirty patients completed both TTOs. In study 2, twenty-nine other patients completed the computer TTO twice to examine test-retest reliability. Feasibility was measured by assessing actual and perceived time duration and general experience of the patient. Agreement between utility scores of both TTOs was measured by Bland-Altman analysis.
Both TTOs were feasible. The computer TTO showed high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis showed a small mean difference (0.06, SD = 0.14, effect size=0.30) between both TTOs. Limits of agreement were wide (-0.22 to 0.34). Differences between interview and computer TTO utilities did not vary over the range of scores.
The computer TTO was feasible and reliable, but did not provide similar results as the interview TTO. However, no systematic biases in the differences were found over the range of scores.
时间权衡(TTO)是一种用于评估健康相关生活质量的工具。本研究评估了类风湿关节炎(RA)中计算机 TTO 的重测信度,并比较了计算机 TTO 与访谈 TTO 在可行性和一致性方面的差异。
在使用交叉设计的研究 1 中,30 名患者完成了两种 TTO。在研究 2 中,另外 29 名患者两次完成计算机 TTO,以评估重测信度。通过评估患者的实际和感知时间持续时间以及总体体验来衡量可行性。通过 Bland-Altman 分析来衡量两种 TTO 之间的效用评分的一致性。
两种 TTO 都具有可行性。计算机 TTO 具有较高的重测信度(ICC=0.88)。Bland-Altman 分析显示两种 TTO 之间存在较小的平均差异(0.06,SD=0.14,效应大小=0.30)。一致性界限较宽(-0.22 至 0.34)。访谈 TTO 和计算机 TTO 之间的效用差异在得分范围内没有变化。
计算机 TTO 是可行且可靠的,但与访谈 TTO 提供的结果并不相同。然而,在得分范围内没有发现差异存在系统性偏差。