Suppr超能文献

视障人士的效用值:时间权衡法与视觉生活质量量表的比较

Utility values in the visually impaired: comparing time-trade off and VisQoL.

作者信息

Gothwal Vijaya K, Bagga Deepak K

机构信息

Meera and L B Deshpande Centre for Sight Enhancement, Vision Rehabilitation Centres, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):843-54. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318291063a.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Visual impairment (VI) negatively affects quality of life (QoL). Utilities represent a way of measuring the QoL impact associated with a particular health state, like VI, and are also useful in economic evaluations of health care interventions. Utilities can be determined either directly or indirectly. Here we determine whether the Vision and Quality of Life Index, VisQoL (indirect approach), is acceptable to use in patients with VI in an urban setting in South India; whether the VisQoL utility values, derived from an Australian sample of both visually impaired and normally sighted participants, demonstrate agreement (if any) with direct utilities, determined by time trade-off (TTO), from visually impaired South Indian patients; and determine the relationship between utilities and self-reported visual disability.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-nine adults with VI were administered the two-item TTO item, six-item VisQoL, and the 16-item Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease-Visual Function Questionnaire (APEDS-VFQ) in a face-to-face interview. The VisQoL utilities were derived from the utility scoring algorithm. Rasch-scaled scores of the APEDS-VFQ were obtained using the conversion scores sheets. Agreement between TTO and utilities VisQoL was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

All participants (response rate, 100%) completed the VisQoL as compared with 72% for the TTO. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean utilities from the two methods (0.65 ± 0.31 by TTO vs. 0.66 ± 0.27 by VisQoL, p = 0.67). However, the 95% limits of agreement on the Bland-Altman plot were wide (-0.65, 0.67), implying a lack of agreement between the methods. The VisQoL relates relatively strongly with APEDS-VFQ as compared with TTO (TTO vs. APEDS-VFQ, r = -0.23, VisQoL vs. APEDS-VFQ, r = -0.66, z = -6.70; p < 0.001 for both). Older participants, female, and those with less than 12 years of education had lower utilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct (TTO) and indirect (VisQoL) methods of utility evaluation tend to disagree in our patients with VI. Given the high completion rates of the VisQoL as compared with the TTO, the VisQoL may be a suitable alternative for utility assessment in an Indian population.

摘要

目的

视力损害(VI)对生活质量(QoL)有负面影响。效用值是衡量与特定健康状态(如VI)相关的生活质量影响的一种方式,在医疗保健干预措施的经济评估中也很有用。效用值可以直接或间接确定。在此,我们要确定视力与生活质量指数(VisQoL,间接方法)在印度南部城市环境中的VI患者中使用是否可接受;从澳大利亚视力受损和视力正常参与者样本得出的VisQoL效用值与通过时间权衡法(TTO)确定的印度南部视力受损患者的直接效用值之间是否存在一致性(若有);并确定效用值与自我报告的视力残疾之间的关系。

方法

对349名患有VI的成年人进行面对面访谈,向他们发放两项TTO问卷、六项VisQoL问卷和16项安得拉邦眼病 - 视觉功能问卷(APEDS - VFQ)。VisQoL效用值来自效用评分算法。使用转换评分表获得APEDS - VFQ的Rasch量表分数。使用Bland - Altman方法评估TTO和VisQoL效用值之间的一致性。

结果

所有参与者(回复率100%)都完成了VisQoL问卷,而TTO问卷的完成率为72%。两种方法得出的平均效用值无统计学显著差异(TTO为0.65±0.31,VisQoL为0.66±0.27,p = 0.67)。然而,Bland - Altman图上的95%一致性界限较宽(-0.65,0.67),这意味着两种方法之间缺乏一致性。与TTO相比,VisQoL与APEDS - VFQ的相关性相对较强(TTO与APEDS - VFQ,r = -0.23;VisQoL与APEDS - VFQ,r = -0.66,z = -6.70;两者p均<0.001)。年龄较大的参与者、女性以及受教育年限少于12年的参与者效用值较低。

结论

在我们的VI患者中,效用评估的直接方法(TTO)和间接方法(VisQoL)往往不一致。鉴于与TTO相比,VisQoL的完成率较高,VisQoL可能是印度人群效用评估的合适替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验