Division of Infectious Diseases, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 2 Aquarium Drive, Suite 305, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 30;11:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-261.
Candida albicans is the most common cause of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Systemic infections due to C. albicans exhibit good susceptibility to fluconazole and echinocandins. However, the echinocandin anidulafungin was recently demonstrated to be more effective than fluconazole for systemic Candida infections in a randomized, double-blind trial among 245 patients. In that trial, most infections were caused by C. albicans, and all respective isolates were susceptible to randomized study drug. We sought to better understand the factors associated with the enhanced efficacy of anidulafungin and hypothesized that intrinsic properties of the antifungal agents contributed to the treatment differences.
Global responses at end of intravenous study treatment in patients with C. albicans infection were compared post-hoc. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to predict response and to adjust for differences in independent baseline characteristics. Analyses focused on time to negative blood cultures, persistent infection at end of intravenous study treatment, and 6-week survival.
In total, 135 patients with C. albicans infections were identified. Among these, baseline APACHE II scores were similar between treatment arms. In these patients, global response was significantly better for anidulafungin than fluconazole (81.1% vs 62.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference, 3.7-33.9). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the odds ratio for global response was 2.36 (95% CI, 1.06-5.25). Study treatment and APACHE II score were significant predictors of outcome. The most predictive logistic regression model found that the odds ratio for study treatment was 2.60 (95% CI, 1.14-5.91) in favor of anidulafungin, and the odds ratio for APACHE II score was 0.935 (95% CI, 0.885-0.987), with poorer responses associated with higher baseline APACHE II scores. Anidulafungin was associated with significantly faster clearance of blood cultures (log-rank p < 0.05) and significantly fewer persistent infections (2.7% vs 13.1%; p < 0.05). Survival through 6 weeks did not differ between treatment groups.
In patients with C. albicans infection, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole, with more rapid clearance of positive blood cultures. This suggests that the fungicidal activity of echinocandins may have important clinical implications.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00058682.
白色念珠菌是引起念珠菌血症和其他侵袭性念珠菌病的最常见原因。白色念珠菌引起的全身感染对氟康唑和棘白菌素类药物具有良好的敏感性。然而,在一项针对 245 名患者的随机、双盲试验中,棘白菌素类药物安尼卡fungin 被证明比氟康唑更有效治疗全身性念珠菌感染。在该试验中,大多数感染是由白色念珠菌引起的,所有相应的分离株对随机研究药物均敏感。我们试图更好地了解增强安尼卡fungin 疗效的相关因素,并假设抗真菌药物的内在特性促成了治疗差异。
对白色念珠菌感染患者静脉内研究治疗结束时的全球反应进行事后比较。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以预测反应,并调整独立基线特征的差异。分析重点是血培养阴性的时间、静脉内研究治疗结束时的持续感染以及 6 周的生存率。
共确定了 135 例白色念珠菌感染患者。这些患者中,治疗组之间的基线急性生理与慢性健康状况评分 II(APACHE II)评分相似。在这些患者中,安尼卡fungin 的全球反应明显优于氟康唑(81.1% vs 62.3%;95%置信区间[CI]差异为 3.7-33.9)。调整基线特征后,全球反应的优势比为 2.36(95%CI,1.06-5.25)。研究治疗和 APACHE II 评分是结局的显著预测因素。最具预测性的逻辑回归模型发现,研究治疗的优势比为 2.60(95%CI,1.14-5.91)有利于安尼卡fungin,APACHE II 评分的优势比为 0.935(95%CI,0.885-0.987),基线 APACHE II 评分越高,反应越差。安尼卡fungin 与血培养更快清除(对数秩检验,p<0.05)和更少持续感染(2.7% vs 13.1%;p<0.05)显著相关。两组 6 周的生存率无差异。
在白色念珠菌感染患者中,安尼卡fungin 比氟康唑更有效,阳性血培养的清除速度更快。这表明棘白菌素类药物的杀菌活性可能具有重要的临床意义。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00058682。