Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):468-76. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d94d.
To test the effects of three multifaceted safety programs designed to decrease insulin administration errors, anticoagulant prescription and administration errors, and errors leading to accidental removal of endotracheal tubes and central venous catheters, respectively. Medical errors and adverse events are associated with increased mortality in intensive care patients, indicating an urgent need for prevention programs.
Multicenter cluster-randomized study.
One medical intensive care unit in a university hospital and two medical-surgical intensive care units in community hospitals belonging to the Outcomerea Study Group.
Consecutive patients >18 yrs admitted from January 2007 to January 2008 to the intensive care units.
We tested three multifaceted safety programs vs. standard care in random order, each over 2.5 months, after a 1.5-month observation period.
Incidence rates of medical errors/1000 patient-days in the multifaceted safety program and standard-care groups were compared using adjusted hierarchical models. In 2117 patients with 15,014 patient-days, 8520 medical errors (567.5/1000 patient-days) were reported, including 1438 adverse events (16.9%, 95.8/1000 patient-days). The insulin multifaceted safety program significantly decreased errors during implementation (risk ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.82; p = .0003) and after implementation (risk ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.73; p = .0004). A significant Hawthorne effect was found. The accidental tube/catheter removal multifaceted safety program decreased errors significantly during implementation (odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.81; p = .01]) and nonsignificantly after implementation (OR 1.65; 95% CI 0.78-3.48). The anticoagulation multifaceted safety program was not significantly effective (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26-1.59) but produced a significant Hawthorne effect.
A multifaceted program was effective in preventing insulin errors and accidental tube/catheter removal. Significant Hawthorne effects occurred, emphasizing the need for appropriately designed studies before definitively implementing strategies.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00461461.
测试三种多方面安全方案的效果,这些方案旨在分别减少胰岛素给药错误、抗凝剂处方和给药错误以及导致意外拔出气管内导管和中心静脉导管的错误。医疗错误和不良事件与重症监护患者的死亡率增加有关,这表明迫切需要预防计划。
多中心集群随机研究。
Outcomerea 研究组所属的一所大学医院的一个内科重症监护病房和两所社区医院的内科-外科重症监护病房。
2007 年 1 月至 2008 年 1 月期间连续入住重症监护病房的年龄>18 岁的患者。
在为期 1.5 个月的观察期后,我们以随机顺序测试了三种多方面的安全方案与标准护理的效果,每个方案持续 2.5 个月。
使用调整后的分层模型比较多方面安全方案和标准护理组中每 1000 个患者-天的医疗错误发生率。在 2117 名患者的 15014 个患者-天中,报告了 8520 例医疗错误(567.5/1000 患者-天),其中包括 1438 例不良事件(16.9%,95.8/1000 患者-天)。胰岛素多方面安全方案在实施过程中(风险比 0.65;95%置信区间[CI]0.52-0.82;p=0.0003)和实施后(风险比 0.51;95%CI0.35-0.73;p=0.0004)显著降低了错误发生率。发现了显著的霍桑效应。意外管/导管移除多方面安全方案在实施过程中显著降低了错误发生率(比值比[OR]0.34;95%CI0.15-0.81;p=0.01]),实施后错误发生率虽无统计学意义,但也有所降低(OR 1.65;95%CI0.78-3.48)。抗凝多方面安全方案效果不显著(OR 0.64;95%CI0.26-1.59),但产生了显著的霍桑效应。
多方面方案在预防胰岛素错误和意外管/导管移除方面是有效的。显著的霍桑效应发生了,这强调了在明确实施策略之前,需要进行适当设计的研究。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00461461。