Suppr超能文献

C 臂平板探测器 CT(DynaCT)与多层 CT(MSCT)的辐射剂量比较:一项体模研究。

The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): a phantom study.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Beijing 100053, PR China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3577-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the radiation dose of DynaCT in phantoms to that of MSCT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A male Anderson Radiation Therapy 200 phantom with embedded thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) was scanned with DynaCT (Axiom Artis dTA, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) and MSCTs (MSCT1: Lightspeed VCT, GE, Milwaukee, USA; MSCT2: Sensation Cardiac 64, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), respectively. For DynaCT, radiation exposure data with automatic exposure control were obtained from scanning of head, chest and abdomen. For MSCT, scanning protocols for head, chest, and abdomen were examined under conventional exposure conditions. Effective doses were calculated from LiF-TLD measurements according to ICRP103. A Catphan phantom (Phantom Lab, USA) was used to evaluate the spatial resolution and low contrast detectability of DynaCT and MSCT.

RESULTS

The effective doses for DynaCT from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 1.18, 7.32, 7.48 mSv (20 s scan) and 0.85, 6.01, 7.04 mSv (8 s scan); the effective doses for MSCT from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 3.33, 7.62 and 8.42 mSv (MSCT1), and 1.89, 7.52, 8.23 mSv (MSCT2). Significant difference between the organ doses from DynaCT and from MSCT (p<.05) was shown. The spatial resolution of 12 lp/cm was achieved and it was able to recognize a 3mm low contrast object at 0.5% contrast level in DynaCT, which was on the same level as in the MSCT images.

CONCLUSION

The phantom study indicates that DynaCT applies significantly less dose to patient and achieves similar spatial resolution and low contrast detectability to standard diagnostic MSCT.

摘要

目的

评估并比较 DynaCT 与 MSCT 在体模中的辐射剂量。

方法与材料

采用具有嵌入式热释光剂量计(TLDs)的男性安德森放射治疗 200 体模,分别用 DynaCT(Axiom Artis dTA,西门子医疗,德国福伊希特旺)和 MSCT(MSCT1:Lightspeed VCT,GE,美国密尔沃基;MSCT2:Sensation 心脏 64,西门子医疗,德国埃尔兰根)进行扫描。对于 DynaCT,从头部、胸部和腹部的自动曝光控制扫描中获得了辐射暴露数据。对于 MSCT,在常规曝光条件下检查了头部、胸部和腹部的扫描协议。根据 ICRP103 从 LiF-TLD 测量中计算出有效剂量。使用 Catphan 体模(Phantom Lab,美国)评估 DynaCT 和 MSCT 的空间分辨率和低对比度检测能力。

结果

20 秒扫描时,DynaCT 头部、胸部和腹部扫描的有效剂量分别为 1.18、7.32、7.48mSv 和 0.85、6.01、7.04mSv;8 秒扫描时,DynaCT 头部、胸部和腹部扫描的有效剂量分别为 3.33、7.62 和 8.42mSv(MSCT1)和 1.89、7.52、8.23mSv(MSCT2)。DynaCT 和 MSCT 的器官剂量之间存在显著差异(p<.05)。DynaCT 实现了 12lp/cm 的空间分辨率,能够识别 0.5%对比度水平的 3mm 低对比度物体,与 MSCT 图像的水平相同。

结论

该体模研究表明,DynaCT 对患者的辐射剂量明显较低,并且在空间分辨率和低对比度检测能力方面与标准诊断 MSCT 相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验