Muhanna Nidal, Douglas Catriona M, Daly Michael J, Chan Harley H L, Weersink Robert, Townson Jason, Monteiro Eric, Yu Eugene, Weimer Emilie, Kucharczyk Walter, Jaffray David A, Irish Jonathan C, de Almeida John R
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jul;82(Suppl 3):e306-e314. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701211. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Skull base surgery requires precise preoperative assessment and intraoperative management of the patient. Surgical navigation is routinely used for complex skull base cases; however, the image guidance is commonly based on preoperative scans alone. The primary objective of this study was to assess the image quality of intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) within anatomical landmarks used in sinus and skull base surgery. The secondary objective was to assess the registration error of a surgical navigation system based on intraoperative CBCT. Present study is a retrospective case series of image quality after intraoperative cone beam CT. The study was conducted at Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto. A total of 46 intraoperative scans (34 patients, 21 skull base, 13 head and neck) were studied. Thirty anatomical landmarks (vascular, soft tissue, and bony) within the sinuses and anterior skull base were evaluated for general image quality characteristics: (1) bony detail visualization; (2) soft-tissue visualization; (3) vascular visualization; and (4) freedom from artifacts (e.g., metal). Levels of intravenous (IV) contrast enhancement were quantified in Hounsfield's units (HU). Standard paired-point registration between imaging and tracker coordinates was performed using 6 to 8 skin fiducial markers and the corresponding fiducial registration error (FRE) was measured. Median score for bony detail on CBCT was 5, remaining at 5 after administration of IV contrast. Median soft-tissue score was 2 for both pre- and postcontrast. Median vascular score was 1 precontrast and 3 postcontrast. Median score for artifacts on CBCT were 2 for both pre-and postcontrast, and metal objects were noted to be the most significant source of artifact. Intraoperative CBCT allowed preresection images and immediate postresection images to be available to the skull base surgeon. There was a significant improvement in mean (standard deviation [SD]) CT intensity in the left carotid artery postcontrast 334 HU (67 HU) ( < 10 ). The mean FRE was 1.8 mm (0.45 mm). Intraoperative CBCT in complex skull base procedures provides high-resolution bony detail allowing immediate assessment of complex resections. The use of IV contrast with CBCT improves the visualization of vasculature. Image-guidance based on CBCT yields registration errors consistent with standard techniques.
颅底手术需要对患者进行精确的术前评估和术中管理。手术导航常用于复杂的颅底病例;然而,图像引导通常仅基于术前扫描。
本研究的主要目的是评估术中锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在鼻窦和颅底手术中使用的解剖标志内的图像质量。次要目的是评估基于术中CBCT的手术导航系统的配准误差。
本研究是一项关于术中锥形束CT后图像质量的回顾性病例系列研究。
该研究在多伦多大学健康网络的多伦多综合医院和玛格丽特公主癌症中心进行。
共研究了46例术中扫描(34例患者,21例颅底手术,13例头颈部手术)。
对鼻窦和前颅底内的30个解剖标志(血管、软组织和骨骼)的一般图像质量特征进行了评估:(1)骨细节可视化;(2)软组织可视化;(3)血管可视化;(4)无伪影(如金属)。静脉内(IV)对比增强水平以亨氏单位(HU)进行量化。使用6至8个皮肤基准标记在成像和跟踪器坐标之间进行标准配对点配准,并测量相应的基准配准误差(FRE)。
CBCT上骨细节的中位数分数为5,静脉注射对比剂后仍为5。对比剂前后软组织的中位数分数均为2。对比剂前血管中位数分数为1,对比剂后为3。CBCT上伪影的中位数分数在对比剂前后均为2,金属物体被认为是最主要的伪影来源。术中CBCT使颅底外科医生能够获得切除前图像和切除后即时图像。对比剂注射后左颈动脉的平均(标准差[SD])CT强度有显著改善,为334 HU(67 HU)( < 10 )。平均FRE为1.8毫米(0.45毫米)。
复杂颅底手术中的术中CBCT提供了高分辨率的骨细节,可立即评估复杂切除情况。CBCT使用静脉对比剂可改善血管系统的可视化。基于CBCT的图像引导产生的配准误差与标准技术一致。