Suppr超能文献

家庭与健康互动。

Families and health interactions.

机构信息

Université Catholique de Louvain, Clinic of Mont-Godinne, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychiatr Danub. 2011 Sep;23(3):270-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, psychologists of health have attempted to understand the relations between family dynamics and health. The aim of our study is not only to study relations inside families and couples (relations between family of origin, nuclear and ideal family, current and ideal couple) but also outside between families and couples and different health indicator (physical and mental health, consumption of medications, and frequency of medical consultations).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects are included in a two years long longitudinal study. At baseline, subjects' age, gender, family composition, net income, chronic treatments, family dynamics (FACES III), Health Locus of Control (MHLC), and personality (NEO-FFI) are recorded.

RESULTS

The adaptability level that we experience in our current couple appears partially to be an inherited value of the adaptability that we had in our family of origin (r=0.694; p=0.026). Moreover, the closer we are to each other in our nuclear family, the closer and more adaptable is our couple (r=0.893; p=0.007). Cohesion in the nuclear family is correlated with a desire for even more cohesion in the ideal family (r=0.898; p=0.000) and in the ideal couple (r=0.732; p=0.016). The only mechanism that slows down this aspiration for "always more" cohesion is the cohesion that the current couple is experiencing. Some of these factors seem to affect health indicators: cohesion of the ideal family and of the family of origin as well as cohesion of the current couple have positive effects on health indicators whereas levels of adaptability of the ideal family and the current couple have negative effects on health indicators.

CONCLUSION

At T0 and T6 months, the level of physical health appears to be the more predictable variable. At time T0, a tree factors model of linear regression including cohesion of family of origin, and of the current couple, with adaptability of the ideal family explains 82.4% of the variance. At time T6months, nuclear family cohesion, account for 46.5% of the variance.

摘要

背景

近年来,健康心理学家试图理解家庭动态与健康之间的关系。我们的研究目的不仅是研究家庭内部和夫妻之间的关系(原生家庭、核心家庭和理想家庭、当前和理想伴侣之间的关系),还研究家庭和夫妻与不同健康指标(身心健康、药物使用和就诊频率)之间的关系。

受试者和方法

我们纳入了 20 名健康受试者进行为期两年的纵向研究。在基线时,记录受试者的年龄、性别、家庭构成、净收入、慢性治疗、家庭动态(FACES III)、健康控制源(MHLC)和人格(NEO-FFI)。

结果

我们在当前伴侣关系中体验到的适应性水平,部分上是我们在原生家庭中具有的适应性的遗传价值(r=0.694;p=0.026)。此外,我们在核心家庭中彼此越亲近,我们的伴侣关系就越亲密和适应性越强(r=0.893;p=0.007)。核心家庭的凝聚力与对理想家庭(r=0.898;p=0.000)和理想伴侣(r=0.732;p=0.016)的更大凝聚力的渴望相关。唯一减缓这种“总是更多”凝聚力的愿望的机制是当前伴侣关系所经历的凝聚力。这些因素中的一些似乎会影响健康指标:理想家庭和原生家庭的凝聚力以及当前伴侣关系的凝聚力对健康指标有积极影响,而理想家庭和当前伴侣关系的适应性水平对健康指标有负面影响。

结论

在 T0 和 T6 个月时,身体健康水平似乎是更可预测的变量。在 T0 时,包括原生家庭凝聚力和当前伴侣关系在内的适应性的线性回归树因子模型解释了 82.4%的方差。在 T6 个月时,核心家庭凝聚力占 46.5%的方差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验