Suppr超能文献

培训活动在减少初级保健实验室样本分析前误差中的作用。

Role of training activities for the reduction of pre-analytical errors in laboratory samples from primary care.

机构信息

Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Hematología y Laboratorio, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Jan 18;413(1-2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presence of pre-analytical errors (PE) is a usual contingency in laboratories. The incidence may increase where it is difficult to control that period, as it is the case with samples sent from primary care (PC) to clinical reference laboratory. Detection of a large number of PE in PC samples in our Institution led to the development and implementation of preventive strategies. The first of these has been the realization of a cycle of educational sessions for PC nurses, followed by the evaluation of their impact on PE number.

METHODS

The incidence of PE was assessed in two periods, before (October-November 2007) and after (October-November, 2009) the implementation of educational sessions. Eleven PC centers in the urban area and 17 in the rural area participated. In the urban area, samples were withdrawn by any PC nurse; in the rural area, samples were obtained by the patient's reference nurse. The types of analyzed PE included missed sample (MS), hemolyzed sample (HS), coagulated sample (CS), incorrect sample (ISV) and others (OPE), such as lipemic or icteric serum or plasma.

RESULTS

In the former period, we received 52,669 blood samples and 18,852 urine samples, detecting 3885 (7.5%) and 1567 (8.3%) PEs, respectively. After the educational intervention, there were 52,659 and 19,048 samples with 5057 (9.6%) and 1.256 (6.5%) PEs, respectively (p<0.001). According to the type of PE, the incidents compared before and after compared incidences were: MS, 4.8% vs. 3.8%, p<0.001; HS, 1.97% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001; CS, 0.54% vs. 0.25%, p<0.001; ISV, 0.15% vs. 0.19% p=0.08; and OPE, 0.3% vs. 0.42%, p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Surprisingly the PE incidence increased after the educational intervention, although it should be noted that it was primarily due to the increase of HS, as the other EP incidence decreased (MS and CS) or remained unchanged (ISV). This seems to indicate the need for a comprehensive approach to reduce the incidence of errors in the pre-analytical period, as one stage interventions do not seem to be effective enough.

摘要

背景

分析前误差(PE)的存在在实验室中是一种常见的意外情况。在难以控制该时期的情况下,发生率可能会增加,例如将来自初级保健(PC)的样本发送到临床参考实验室的情况。我们机构在 PC 样本中发现大量 PE 后,制定并实施了预防策略。其中的第一个策略是为 PC 护士开展一系列教育课程,然后评估其对 PE 数量的影响。

方法

在实施教育课程之前(2007 年 10 月至 11 月)和之后(2009 年 10 月至 11 月)评估了 PE 的发生率。市区有 11 个 PC 中心,农村有 17 个 PC 中心参与。在市区,任何 PC 护士都可以抽取样本;在农村,由患者的参考护士采集样本。分析的 PE 类型包括漏检样本(MS)、溶血样本(HS)、凝固样本(CS)、错误样本(ISV)和其他(OPE),如脂血或黄疸血清或血浆。

结果

在前一时期,我们共收到 52669 份血样和 18852 份尿样,分别检测到 3885(7.5%)和 1567(8.3%)例 PE。教育干预后,共收到 52659 份血样和 19048 份尿样,分别检测到 5057(9.6%)和 1.256(6.5%)例 PE(p<0.001)。根据 PE 类型,与干预前相比,干预后的发生率分别为:MS(4.8%比 3.8%),p<0.001;HS(1.97%比 3.9%),p<0.001;CS(0.54%比 0.25%),p<0.001;ISV(0.15%比 0.19%),p=0.08;OPE(0.3%比 0.42%),p<0.001。

结论

令人惊讶的是,教育干预后 PE 的发生率增加了,尽管应该注意到,这主要是由于 HS 的增加所致,因为其他 EP 的发生率下降(MS 和 CS)或保持不变(ISV)。这似乎表明需要采取综合方法来降低分析前阶段的错误发生率,因为单阶段干预似乎不够有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验