Suppr超能文献

分析前变量的患病率及其对凝血检测的影响的定量评估。干预能否提高患者安全性?

Quantitative assessment of prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effect on coagulation assay. Can intervention improve patient safety?

作者信息

Bhushan Ravi, Sen Arijit

机构信息

Graded Specialist (Pathology), Military Hospital Bhopal, MP, India.

Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr;73(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Very few Indian studies exist on evaluation of pre-analytical variables affecting "Prothrombin Time" the commonest coagulation assay performed. The study was performed in an Indian tertiary care setting with an aim to assess quantitatively the prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effects on the results (patient safety), for Prothrombin time test. The study also evaluated their effects on the result and whether intervention, did correct the results.

METHODS

The firstly evaluated the prevalence for various pre-analytical variables detected in samples sent for Prothrombin Time testing. These samples with the detected variables wherever possible were tested and result noted. The samples from the same patients were repeated and retested ensuring that no pre-analytical variable is present. The results were again noted to check for difference the intervention produced.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 9989 samples received for PT/INR over a period of 18 months. The prevalence of different pre-analytical variables was found to be 862 (8.63%). The proportion of various pre-analytical variables detected were haemolysed samples 515 (5.16%), over filled vacutainers 62 (0.62%), under filled vacutainers 39 (0.39%), low values 205 (2.05%), clotted samples 11 (0.11%), wrong labeling 4 (0.04%), wrong vacutainer use 2 (0.02%), chylous samples 7 (0.07%) and samples with more than one variable 17 (0.17%). The comparison of percentage of samples showing errors were noted for the first variables since they could be tested with and without the variable in place. The reduction in error percentage was 91.5%, 69.2%, 81.5% and 95.4% post intervention for haemolysed, overfilled, under filled and samples collected with excess pressure at phlebotomy respectively.

CONCLUSION

Correcting the variables did reduce the error percentage to a great extent in these four variables and hence the variables are found to affect "Prothrombin Time" testing and can hamper patient safety.

摘要

背景

在印度,针对影响最常用凝血检测项目“凝血酶原时间”的分析前变量进行评估的研究极少。本研究在印度一家三级医疗机构开展,旨在定量评估分析前变量的发生率及其对凝血酶原时间检测结果的影响(患者安全性)。该研究还评估了这些变量对结果的影响以及干预措施是否能纠正结果。

方法

首先评估送检进行凝血酶原时间检测的样本中各种分析前变量的发生率。对检测到存在变量的样本尽可能进行检测并记录结果。对同一患者的样本进行重复采样并重新检测,确保不存在分析前变量。再次记录结果以检查干预措施产生的差异。

结果

该研究在18个月内评估了9989份接受凝血酶原时间/国际标准化比值(PT/INR)检测的样本。发现不同分析前变量的发生率为862例(8.63%)。检测到的各种分析前变量的比例分别为:溶血样本515例(5.16%)、采血管充盈过度62例(0.62%)、采血管充盈不足39例(0.39%)、数值偏低205例(2.05%)、凝血样本11例(0.11%)、标签错误4例(0.04%)、采血管使用错误2例(0.02%)、乳糜样样本7例(0.07%)以及存在多个变量的样本17例(0.17%)。对于显示有误差的样本百分比,对首个变量进行了比较,因为可以在有或没有该变量的情况下进行检测。干预后,溶血、充盈过度、充盈不足以及采血时压力过大采集的样本的误差百分比分别降低了91.5%、69.2%、81.5%和95.4%。

结论

纠正这些变量在很大程度上降低了这四个变量的误差百分比,因此发现这些变量会影响“凝血酶原时间”检测,并可能危及患者安全。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Types and frequency of preanalytical errors in haematology lab.血液学实验室分析前误差的类型及频率
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Nov;7(11):2491-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6399.3587. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
7
Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.十年后统计实验室的误差:类型与频率
Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. Epub 2007 May 24.
9
The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results.标本溶血对凝血试验结果的影响。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Nov;126(5):748-55. doi: 10.1309/03FK-3378-YTRA-1FRF.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验