• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Training experts: individuation without naming is worth it.培养专家:个体化而不命名是值得的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):14-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025610. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
2
Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?面孔失认症中 Greeble 专长的获得是否排除了一般领域的缺陷?
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(2):289-304. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.023. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
3
Training 'greeble' experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes.
Vision Res. 1998 Aug;38(15-16):2401-28. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00442-2.
4
The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.学习预测感知目标的物体类别所产生的感知效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1307-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036822. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition.成为一名“greeble”专家:探索人脸识别机制。
Vision Res. 1997 Jun;37(12):1673-82. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6.
6
Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia.正常获取绿斑(greebles)技能:两个获得性面孔失认症病例研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5123-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317125111. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical analysis of similarity-based approaches.类别标签对相似性判断的影响:基于相似性方法的批判性分析。
Dev Psychol. 2012 May;48(3):890-6. doi: 10.1037/a0026075. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
Is increased activation in the fusiform face area to Greebles a result of appropriate expertise training or caused by Greebles' face likeness?梭状回面孔区对Greebles的激活增加是适当的专业训练的结果,还是由Greebles与面孔的相似性引起的?
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 17;17:1224721. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1224721. eCollection 2023.
9
Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception.专业知识增加了面孔和物体感知之间的功能重叠。
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
10
Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception.中等复杂度片段的基本层次分类揭示了视觉感知中专业知识的自上而下效应。
J Vis. 2011 Jul 28;11(8):18. doi: 10.1167/11.8.18.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual discrimination training increases the speed stimulus processing and leads to an earlier onset of stimulus encoding.视觉辨别训练可提高刺激处理速度,并使刺激编码的起始时间提前。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330284. eCollection 2025.
2
Early Visual Processing and Perception Processes in Object Discrimination Learning.物体辨别学习中的早期视觉处理与感知过程
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jan 28;15:617824. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.617824. eCollection 2021.
3
Single-session label training alters neural competition between objects and faces.单次会话标签训练改变了物体和面孔之间的神经竞争。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Mar;47(3):387-401. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000889. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Individual differences in object recognition.个体在物体识别方面的差异。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):226-251. doi: 10.1037/rev0000129.
5
Visual appearance interacts with conceptual knowledge in object recognition.视觉外观与物体识别中的概念知识相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00793. eCollection 2014.
6
The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.学习预测感知目标的物体类别所产生的感知效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1307-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036822. Epub 2014 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.种族特异性感知辨别力在个体脸识别训练后得到改善。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):330-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01148.x. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
2
The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination.概念知识对视觉辨别力的影响。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):507-23. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000275.
3
Perceptual expertise with objects predicts another hallmark of face perception.对物体的感知专业知识预示着面部感知的另一个特征。
J Vis. 2009 Apr 27;10(4):15.1-12. doi: 10.1167/10.4.15.
4
Conditions for facelike expertise with objects: becoming a Ziggerin expert--but which type?具备类人脸物体专业技能的条件:成为齐格林专家——但属于哪种类型呢?
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1108-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02430.x. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
5
The origin of biases in face perception.面孔知觉偏差的起源。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):676-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02348.x. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
6
The effect of categorisation on sensitivity to second-order relations in novel objects.分类对新异物体二阶关系敏感性的影响。
Perception. 2008;37(4):584-601. doi: 10.1068/p5740.
7
Language is not just for talking: redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories.语言不只是用于交谈:冗余标签有助于新类别的学习。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x.
8
Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left.沃尔夫假说在右视野得到支持,但在左视野则不然。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):489-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509868103. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
9
The training and transfer of real-world perceptual expertise.现实世界感知专业技能的训练与迁移
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00795.x.
10
The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy.语言在婴儿获取物体种类概念中的作用。
Cognition. 2002 Oct;85(3):223-50. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00109-9.

培养专家:个体化而不命名是值得的。

Training experts: individuation without naming is worth it.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Richmond, VA 23173, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):14-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025610. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1037/a0025610
PMID:21967271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3350645/
Abstract

There is growing evidence that individuation experience is necessary for development of expert object discrimination that transfers to new exemplars. Individuation training in human studies has primarily used label association tasks where labels are learned at both the individual and more abstract (basic) level, and expertise criterion requires that individual-level judgments become as fast as basic-level judgments. However, there are training situations when the use of labels is not practical (e.g., with animals or some clinical populations). Moreover, labeling itself can facilitate object discrimination, thus it is unclear what role labels play in the acquisition of expertise in such training paradigms. Here, participants completed an online game that did not require labels in which they interacted with novel objects (Greebles) or control objects (Yufos). Games either required individuation or categorization. We then assessed the impact of this exposure on an abridged Greeble training paradigm. As expected, participants who played Yufo games or Greeble categorization games showed a significant basic-level advantage for Greebles in the abridged training paradigm, typical of novices. However, participants who played the Greeble identity game showed a reduced basic-level advantage, suggesting that individuation without labels may be sufficient to acquire perceptual expertise.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,个体经验对于发展能够转移到新范例的专家对象辨别能力是必要的。在人类研究中,个体化训练主要使用标签关联任务,其中标签在个体和更抽象(基本)的水平上被学习,并且专业标准要求个体水平的判断变得与基本水平的判断一样快。然而,在某些训练情况下,使用标签并不实际(例如,在动物或某些临床人群中)。此外,标签本身可以促进对象辨别,因此尚不清楚标签在这些训练范例中获得专业知识方面扮演什么角色。在这里,参与者完成了一个在线游戏,该游戏不需要标签,他们在其中与新颖的对象(Greebles)或控制对象(Yufos)进行交互。游戏要么需要个体化,要么需要分类。然后,我们评估了这种接触对简化的 Greeble 训练范例的影响。正如预期的那样,玩 Yufo 游戏或 Greeble 分类游戏的参与者在简化的训练范例中对 Greebles 表现出显著的基本水平优势,这是新手的典型表现。然而,玩 Greeble 身份游戏的参与者表现出基本水平优势的降低,这表明没有标签的个体化可能足以获得感知专业知识。