• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Student evaluations of the portfolio process.学生对档案袋过程的评价。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):132. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757132.
2
Pharmacy Students' Perceptions of Reflective Portfolios and their Effect on Students' Deep Information-Processing Skills.药学专业学生对反思性文件夹的看法及其对学生深度信息处理技能的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6851. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6851.
3
A mentor-based portfolio program to evaluate pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.基于导师的作品集计划评估药学学生的自我评估技能。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):81. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77481.
4
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
5
Mapping of the biomedical literature evaluation competencies based on pharmacy students' feedback.基于药学专业学生反馈的生物医学文献评价能力映射
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 12;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0583-7.
6
Comparison of pharmacy students' perceived and actual knowledge using the Pharmacy Curricular Outcomes Assessment.运用《药学院课程成果评估》比较药学学生的感知知识和实际知识。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 May 10;76(4):63. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76463.
7
Development of an instrument to assess the impact of an enhanced experiential model on pharmacy students' learning opportunities, skills and attitudes: a retrospective comparative-experimentalist study.开发一种工具以评估强化体验式模式对药学专业学生学习机会、技能和态度的影响:一项回顾性比较实验研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Apr 8;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-17.
8
A Web-based geriatrics portfolio to document medical students' learning outcomes.一个用于记录医学生学习成果的基于网络的老年医学档案袋。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):937-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00043.
9
A capstone advanced pharmacy practice experience in research.研究方向的高级药学实践体验项目。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):180. doi: 10.5688/aj7410180.
10
Teaching and learning health literacy in a doctor of pharmacy program.在药学博士课程中教授和学习健康素养。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Mar 25;79(2):27. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79227.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Portfolios in US Pharmacy Schools.美国药学院中使用档案袋评价的情况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6239. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6239.
2
Using Continuing Professional Development with Portfolio in a Pharmaceutics Course.在药剂学课程中运用带档案袋的持续专业发展
Pharmacy (Basel). 2016 Nov 7;4(4):36. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy4040036.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic reflective student portfolios to demonstrate achievement of ability-based outcomes during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.电子反思性学生档案袋,用于展示在高级药学实践经验中基于能力的成果的达成情况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Jun 15;74(5). doi: 10.5688/aj740579.
2
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性:BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
3
Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.评估药学专业学生自我评估技能的准确性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Oct 15;71(5):89. doi: 10.5688/aj710589.
4
Using an online portfolio in postgraduate training.在研究生培训中使用在线作品集。
Med Teach. 2006 Dec;28(8):708-12. doi: 10.1080/01421590601047672.
5
Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education.反思性档案袋在健康科学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):34. doi: 10.5688/aj710234.
6
The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.克利夫兰诊所勒纳医学院基于能力评估的组合方法。
Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):493-502. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ead30.
7
Self-assessment in pharmacy education.药学教育中的自我评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):64. doi: 10.5688/aj700364.
8
Personal professional profiles.个人职业简介。
Nurs Stand. 1998;12(38):35-40. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.06.12.38.35.c2513.

学生对档案袋过程的评价。

Student evaluations of the portfolio process.

机构信息

The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, 1295 N. Martin Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):132. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757132.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe757132
PMID:21969718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3175659/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pharmacy students' perceived benefits of the portfolio process and to gather suggestions for improving the process.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed and administered to 250 first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy.

RESULTS

Although the objectives of the portfolio process were for students to understand the expected outcomes, understand the impact of extracurricular activities on attaining competencies, identify what should be learned, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and modify their approach to learning, overall students perceived the portfolio process as having less than moderate benefit. First-year students wanted more examples of portfolios while second- and third-year students suggested that more time with their advisor would be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

The portfolio process will continue to be refined and efforts made to improve students' perceptions of the process as it is intended to develop the self-assessments skills they will need to improve their knowledge and professional skills throughout their pharmacy careers.

摘要

目的

评估药学专业学生对档案袋过程的感知益处,并收集有关改进该过程的建议。

方法

设计并向亚利桑那大学药学院的 250 名一年级、二年级和三年级药学专业学生分发了一份问卷。

结果

尽管档案袋过程的目标是让学生了解预期的结果,了解课外活动对获得能力的影响,确定应该学习什么,了解自己的长处和短处,并调整学习方法,但总体而言,学生认为档案袋过程的益处低于中等。一年级学生希望看到更多的档案袋示例,而二、三年级学生则建议与导师多花些时间。

结论

档案袋过程将继续得到完善,并努力提高学生对该过程的看法,因为它旨在培养学生自我评估技能,这些技能将有助于他们在整个药学职业生涯中提高知识和专业技能。