Schneider Jennifer, O'Hara Kate, Munro Irene
School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2016 Nov 7;4(4):36. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy4040036.
The introduction of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to encourage individual life-long learning as a way of maintaining professional competency in pharmacy has faced resistance. To investigate ways to address this barrier we included CPD with portfolio in a university Pharmaceutics course. Underpinning knowledge for the course was delivered using a flipped classroom approach and students used the CPD model to address clinical scenarios presented in a simulated pharmacy setting. Students produced portfolio items for the different case scenarios and submitted these for assessment. This provided the opportunity for students to carry out repeated application of the CPD cycle and, in so doing, develop skills in critical thinking for self-reflection and self-evaluation. This course was designed to encourage the development of higher level learning skills for future self-directed learning. Thirty six students submitted a completed portfolio. Twenty nine students achieved a result of >70%, five students scored between 57%-69%, one student obtained a mark of 50% and one student failed. The end of course survey revealed that while students found portfolio development challenging (40%), they also reported that it was effective for self-learning (54%). Differentiating between the concepts "reflection" and "evaluation" in CPD was problematic for some students and the use of clearer, simpler language should be used to explain these processes in future CPD work.
引入持续专业发展(CPD)以鼓励个人终身学习,作为维持药学专业能力的一种方式,面临着阻力。为了研究克服这一障碍的方法,我们将CPD与学习档案袋纳入大学药剂学课程。该课程的基础知识通过翻转课堂的方式传授,学生使用CPD模型来处理模拟药房环境中呈现的临床场景。学生针对不同的案例场景制作学习档案袋项目,并提交这些项目进行评估。这为学生提供了反复应用CPD循环的机会,通过这样做,培养自我反思和自我评估的批判性思维技能。本课程旨在鼓励培养未来自主学习所需的更高层次学习技能。三十六名学生提交了完整的学习档案袋。二十九名学生的成绩>70%,五名学生的成绩在57%-69%之间,一名学生获得50分,一名学生不及格。课程结束时的调查显示,虽然学生们发现学习档案袋的制作具有挑战性(40%),但他们也报告说这对自主学习很有效(54%)。对一些学生来说,区分CPD中的“反思”和“评估”概念存在问题,在未来的CPD工作中,应该使用更清晰、更简单的语言来解释这些过程。