Kleinberg I, Kaufman H W, Confessore F
Department of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
Dent Clin North Am. 1990 Jul;34(3):515-29.
Thermal, tactile, osmotic, and electrical stimuli, as well as exposure to air, can each elicit a painful response in individuals with hypersensitive teeth, and thus provide the basis for the different methods used to measure dentinal hypersensitivity. Tactile methods range from simple use of a sharp dental explorer to devices that can quantify the probing or scratching pressure exerted generally along the cementoenamel junction. Thermal methods involve flow of air or metal probes applied in different ways. Electrical stimulus is more complex and generally consists of progressive elevation of the magnitude of the stimulus until a sense of prepain rather than pain is felt. More than one method is usually needed in order to assess dentinal hypersensitivity, which has been estimated to affect one in every seven patients that visit a dental office.
热刺激、触觉刺激、渗透压刺激和电刺激,以及暴露于空气中,都可能在牙齿敏感的个体中引发疼痛反应,从而为用于测量牙本质过敏症的不同方法提供了依据。触觉方法的范围从简单地使用尖锐的牙科探针到能够量化通常沿着牙骨质釉质界施加的探查或刮擦压力的设备。热方法涉及以不同方式应用的空气流动或金属探针。电刺激更为复杂,通常包括逐渐提高刺激强度,直到感觉到预痛而非疼痛。通常需要不止一种方法来评估牙本质过敏症,据估计,每七名就诊于牙科诊所的患者中就有一人受其影响。