Suppr超能文献

蜂胶与5.0%硝酸钾作为牙本质脱敏剂的比较评价:一项临床研究。

A comparative evaluation of propolis and 5.0% potassium nitrate as a dentine desensitizer: A clinical study.

作者信息

Purra Aamir Rashid, Mushtaq Mubashir, Acharya Shashi Rashmi, Saraswati Vidya

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital Srinagar, Kashmir, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jul;18(4):466-71. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.138695.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of saturated ethanolic solution of Propolis for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients aged 20-40 years with 156 hypersensitive teeth were selected for a 3-month study. Each patient was subjected to treatment with saturated ethanolic solution of Propolis, 5% potassium nitrate and distilled water. The patients were recalled at seventh day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks for the application of the agent and re-evaluation. The final re-evaluation of the patients was done after 3 months from the first application. The responses of the patients to the test temperatures were converted to a ranking and data was statistically analyzed. A statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Bonferroni test and Tukey HSD test for multicomparison.

RESULTS

The results between the Propolis group and the potassium nitrate group showed no significant difference in the immediate post-treatment period; however, the results were significant at the end of first week and second week. At 4 weeks and 3 months period, a comparison between the groups again showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that Propolis was more effective than 5% potassium nitrate in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity and had an immediate and sustained effect.

摘要

目的

本临床研究旨在评估蜂胶饱和乙醇溶液治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效。

材料与方法

选取10名年龄在20至40岁之间、患有156颗过敏牙齿的患者进行为期3个月的研究。每位患者分别接受蜂胶饱和乙醇溶液、5%硝酸钾和蒸馏水治疗。在第7天、2周和4周对患者进行回访,进行药物应用及重新评估。在首次用药3个月后对患者进行最终重新评估。将患者对测试温度的反应转化为排名,并对数据进行统计分析。使用方差分析、Bonferroni检验和Tukey HSD检验进行多组比较的统计分析。

结果

蜂胶组和硝酸钾组在治疗后即刻的结果无显著差异;然而,在第一周和第二周结束时结果有显著差异。在4周和3个月时,两组之间的比较再次显示无显著差异。

结论

得出结论,蜂胶在缓解牙本质过敏方面比5%硝酸钾更有效,且具有即刻和持续的效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Effects of Propolis-Based Herbal Toothpaste on Dentine Hypersensitivity.蜂胶草本牙膏对牙本质过敏的影响。
Int Dent J. 2024 Jun;74(3):559-565. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.014. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Propolis: A natural biomaterial for dental and oral healthcare.蜂胶:一种用于牙齿和口腔保健的天然生物材料。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Fall;11(4):265-274. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.046. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验