First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1082-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256766. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Recently, transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been evaluated for mediastinal nodal staging (N staging) of lung cancer, as this technique is less invasive than mediastinoscopy and possibly more accurate than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). However, EUS-FNA does not provide access to pretracheal and hilar lymph nodes. More recently, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been introduced as a novel technique for accessing pretracheal and hilar lymph nodes. Although the combined endoscopic approach of EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA is presumably more accurate than PET-CT, only a few reports have quantitatively evaluated its diagnostic ability. Therefore, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of this combined endoscopic approach for mediastinal N staging of lung cancer.
A consecutive series of 120 patients with suspected resectable lung cancer on CT findings underwent PET-CT and combined EUS-FNA/EBUS-TBNA. The accuracy and other diagnostic indices of the combined approach in mediastinal N staging were compared with those of PET-CT.
Among the enrolled patients, a final pathological N stage was established in 110 patients. The accuracy of the combined approach using EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA was significantly higher than that of PET-CT (90.0 % vs. 73.6 %; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were respectively 71.8 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 86.6 % for the combined approach vs. 47.4 %, 87.5 %, 66.7 %, and 75.9 % for PET-CT.
The combined endoscopic approach using EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA provided excellent diagnostic performance. Therefore, this approach is strongly recommended before surgery or mediastinoscopy to avoid futile thoracotomy and surgical intervention.
最近,经食管内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)已被评估用于肺癌的纵隔淋巴结分期(N 分期),因为与纵隔镜检查相比,该技术的侵袭性更小,而且可能比 18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描与计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)更准确。然而,EUS-FNA 无法获得气管前和肺门淋巴结。最近,经支气管超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)已作为一种新的获取气管前和肺门淋巴结的技术引入。尽管 EUS-FNA 和 EBUS-TBNA 的联合内镜方法推测比 PET-CT 更准确,但只有少数报告定量评估了其诊断能力。因此,我们前瞻性评估了这种联合内镜方法对肺癌纵隔 N 分期的诊断效能。
连续 120 例 CT 发现疑似可切除肺癌的患者接受了 PET-CT 和联合 EUS-FNA/EBUS-TBNA 检查。比较了联合方法在纵隔 N 分期中的准确性和其他诊断指标与 PET-CT 的比较。
在纳入的患者中,110 例患者确定了最终的病理 N 分期。EUS-FNA 和 EBUS-TBNA 联合应用的准确性明显高于 PET-CT(90.0%比 73.6%;P<0.0001)。联合方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 71.8%、100%、100%和 86.6%,而 PET-CT 分别为 47.4%、87.5%、66.7%和 75.9%。
EUS-FNA 和 EBUS-TBNA 联合内镜方法提供了出色的诊断性能。因此,强烈建议在手术或纵隔镜检查前使用这种方法,以避免不必要的开胸手术和外科干预。