University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
Vet Pathol. 2012 Jul;49(4):581-5. doi: 10.1177/0300985811420583. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Veterinary pathologists traditionally have been actively engaged in research as principal investigators and as collaborators. Pathologists frequently obtain advanced training in research; however, it appears that in the last 10 years there has been a reversal of a previous trend toward increasing numbers of pathologists obtaining PhD degrees. This has arisen despite an established shortage of veterinarians engaged in research. This article evaluates the benefits of research training for individual pathologists, including a wide spectrum of professional opportunities and additional skill development beyond that usually provided by diagnostic pathology training alone. Various training models are discussed, including combined and sequential diagnostic residency and research degree training as well as the nondegree research fellowship programs more commonly pursued in human medicine. Best-practice recommendations for program infrastructure, mentorship, time management, and a team approach to research and research training are advocated to facilitate the development of successful programs and to encourage a continued emphasis on integrated training for pathologists as both clinical diagnosticians and experimentalists. This article is intended to help prospective and active pathology trainees, their mentors, and educational administrators optimize opportunities to ensure the future vitality of veterinary pathologists, and their contributions, in basic and applied research.
兽医病理学家传统上一直积极从事研究工作,担任主要研究者和合作者。病理学家经常接受研究方面的高级培训;然而,在过去的 10 年中,获得博士学位的病理学家人数似乎出现了与之前趋势相反的情况。尽管从事研究的兽医数量明显短缺,但仍出现了这种情况。本文评估了研究培训对个体病理学家的好处,包括广泛的专业机会以及除诊断病理学培训通常提供的技能发展之外的其他技能发展。讨论了各种培训模式,包括联合和顺序诊断住院医师和研究学位培训以及在人类医学中更常见的非学位研究研究员计划。提倡最佳实践建议,包括计划基础设施、指导、时间管理以及研究和研究培训的团队方法,以促进成功计划的发展,并鼓励继续强调病理学家作为临床诊断学家和实验人员的综合培训。本文旨在帮助未来和现任的病理学生、他们的导师和教育管理人员优化机会,以确保兽医病理学家在基础和应用研究中的未来活力及其贡献。