Suppr超能文献

莫西沙星和头孢呋辛均不能显著减轻体外循环患者炎症介质的释放:一项随机对照试验。

Neither moxifloxacin nor cefuroxime produces significant attenuation of inflammatory mediator release in patients exposed to cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Anaesthesiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, D-80636 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jan;67(1):230-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr397. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In vitro and experimental studies in animals have established the anti-inflammatory effects of moxifloxacin. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to an inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to assess whether the inflammatory cytokine response to CPB is reduced with a perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, either moxifloxacin or cefuroxime (the standard prophylaxis).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with CPB were randomly assigned to receive either moxifloxacin or cefuroxime as the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Interleukin (IL)-6, -8, -10 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) serum concentrations were determined at eight time points before and after CPB.

RESULTS

In both groups, all cytokine concentrations significantly increased after the start of CPB. There were no statistically significant differences between the moxifloxacin and cefuroxime groups at any point; IL-6 concentrations [median (interquartile range)] 240 min after CPB, the primary endpoint, were 364 (192-598) and 465 (325-906) pg/mL (P = 0.323), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither moxifloxacin nor cefuroxime produced significant attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine response to CPB. The reasons why moxifloxacin did not have significant anti-inflammatory effects in this unique clinical situation may be: (i) the inflammatory response to CPB may be different from that of infectious disease states that were used to establish the immunomodulatory effects of moxifloxacin; and (ii) a single intravenous dose, which was used in this investigation, may not lead to high enough plasma and intracellular concentrations.

摘要

目的

体外和动物实验研究已经证实莫西沙星具有抗炎作用。体外循环(CPB)会引起炎症反应。本研究旨在评估围手术期应用莫西沙星或头孢呋辛(标准预防用药)作为抗生素预防用药是否会减轻 CPB 引起的炎症细胞因子反应。

患者和方法

28 例行 CPB 择期冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者被随机分为莫西沙星组或头孢呋辛组,分别接受围手术期抗生素预防用药。在 CPB 前后 8 个时间点检测白细胞介素(IL)-6、-8、-10 和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的血清浓度。

结果

两组患者 CPB 开始后所有细胞因子浓度均显著升高。莫西沙星组和头孢呋辛组在任何时间点均无统计学差异;CPB 后 240 分钟(主要终点)的 IL-6 浓度中位数(四分位距)分别为 364(192598)和 465(325906)pg/ml(P=0.323)。

结论

莫西沙星和头孢呋辛均不能显著减轻 CPB 引起的炎症细胞因子反应。莫西沙星在这种独特的临床情况下没有显著抗炎作用的原因可能是:(i)CPB 引起的炎症反应与用于证实莫西沙星免疫调节作用的感染性疾病状态的炎症反应不同;(ii)本研究中使用的单次静脉剂量可能不会导致足够高的血浆和细胞内浓度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验