• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险沟通与乳腺癌担忧。

Risk communication and worry about breast cancer.

机构信息

a North Dakota State University , Fargo , North Dakota.

出版信息

Psychol Health Med. 2003 Nov;8(4):379-89. doi: 10.1080/13548500310001604513.

DOI:10.1080/13548500310001604513
PMID:21974728
Abstract

Feedback concerning breast cancer risk was provided to 59 college-aged women who were overestimating their personal risk. In a 2 (Absolute Risk Feedback; yes or no) × 2 (Comparative Risk Feedback; yes or no) design, women completed a brief risk questionnaire and then received both, one, or neither kind of risk feedback. Absolute information reduced estimates of vulnerability, although not to the levels suggested by the feedback. Absolute feedback had no effect on worry about breast cancer, but worry was lower for women who learned that they were no more at risk than other, similar women.

摘要

向 59 名高估自身个人风险的大学年龄女性提供了有关乳腺癌风险的反馈。在 2(绝对风险反馈;是或否)×2(比较风险反馈;是或否)的设计中,女性完成了一个简短的风险问卷,然后收到了全部、部分或没有任何种类的风险反馈。绝对信息降低了对脆弱性的估计,尽管没有达到反馈所建议的水平。绝对反馈对乳腺癌的担忧没有影响,但对于那些得知自己的风险与其他相似女性一样的女性来说,担忧程度较低。

相似文献

1
Risk communication and worry about breast cancer.风险沟通与乳腺癌担忧。
Psychol Health Med. 2003 Nov;8(4):379-89. doi: 10.1080/13548500310001604513.
2
Absolute and comparative risk perceptions as predictors of cancer worry: moderating effects of gender and psychological distress.作为癌症担忧预测因素的绝对风险和比较风险认知:性别和心理困扰的调节作用
J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:37-49. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637301.
3
Cancer worry in women with hereditary risk factors for breast cancer.具有乳腺癌遗传风险因素的女性的癌症担忧。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Sep-Oct;30(5):767-72. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.767-772.
4
Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer.传达社会比较信息对结直肠癌风险认知的影响。
J Health Commun. 2006 Jun;11(4):391-407. doi: 10.1080/10810730600671870.
5
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.基于人群样本的有或无家族病史女性的乳腺癌担忧及乳房X光检查使用情况
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):314-20.
8
Predicting perceived vulnerability for breast cancer among women with an average breast cancer risk.预测平均乳腺癌风险女性对乳腺癌的感知易感性。
Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;11(Pt 4):607-21. doi: 10.1348/135910705X71425.
9
Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries.乳腺癌感知绝对风险、比较风险与担忧之间的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Sep;9(9):973-5.
10
Risk perceptions and worry about cancer: does gender make a difference?对癌症的风险认知与担忧:性别会产生影响吗?
J Health Commun. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):56-79. doi: 10.1080/10810730701807076.

引用本文的文献

1
Worry about prostate cancer and risk perception among middle-aged men: results from the PROBASE trial.中年男性对前列腺癌的担忧及风险认知:PROBASE试验的结果
J Behav Med. 2025 Jun;48(3):464-477. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00559-w. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
Supporting cardiomyopathy screening behavior in adult survivors of childhood cancer: an eHealth motivational interviewing-framed pilot intervention.支持儿童癌症成年幸存者的心肌病筛查行为:一项以电子健康动机性访谈为框架的试点干预措施。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Dec 22. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01724-x.
3
The effect of breast cancer awareness interventions on young women aged 18-50 years: A systematic review.
乳腺癌认知干预措施对18至50岁年轻女性的影响:一项系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(3):559-575. doi: 10.1177/13591053241270614. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
4
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.优先考虑 AML 患者的担忧:使用最佳最差标度法量化患者体验。
Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1104-1111. doi: 10.1002/pon.5652. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey.新冠疫情阴谋论信念与预防措施的心理关联:来自土耳其的证据。
Curr Psychol. 2021;40(11):5708-5717. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Priority of Risk (But Not Perceived Magnitude of Risk) Predicts Improved Sun-Protection Behavior Following Genetic Counseling for Familial Melanoma.风险优先级(而非感知风险大小)可预测家族性黑色素瘤遗传咨询后防晒行为的改善。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Feb 12;55(1):24-40. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa028.
7
Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施(包括提供个性化癌症风险信息)对风险感知准确性和心理反应的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
8
Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.纳入个性化癌症风险信息的干预措施对意图和行为的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e017717. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017717.
9
The distinct role of comparative risk perceptions in a breast cancer prevention program.比较风险感知在乳腺癌预防计划中的独特作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):262-8. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9287-8.
10
Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%.风险感知:为何 6%的癌症风险并不总是感觉如此。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81 Suppl:S87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041. Epub 2010 Aug 23.