Ogunyemi Dotun, Eno Michelle, Rad Steve, Fong Alex, Alexander Carolyn, Azziz Ricardo
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):423-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00048.1.
The purpose of this article was to develop and determine the utility of a compliance form in evaluating and teaching the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies of professionalism, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice.
In 2006, we introduced a 17-item compliance form in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program. The form prospectively monitored residents on attendance at required activities (5 items), accountability of required obligations (9 items), and completion of assigned projects (3 items). Scores were compared to faculty evaluations of residents, resident status as a contributor or a concerning resident, and to the residents' conflict styles, using the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict MODE Instrument.
Our analysis of 18 residents for academic year 2007-2008 showed a mean (standard error of mean) of 577 (65.3) for postgraduate year (PGY)-1, 692 (42.4) for PGY-2, 535 (23.3) for PGY-3, and 651.6 (37.4) for PGY-4. Non-Hispanic white residents had significantly higher scores on compliance, faculty evaluations on interpersonal and communication skills, and competence in systems-based practice. Contributing residents had significantly higher scores on compliance compared with concerning residents. Senior residents had significantly higher accountability scores compared with junior residents, and junior residents had increased project completion scores. Attendance scores increased and accountability scores decreased significantly between the first and second 6 months of the academic year. There were positive correlations between compliance scores with competing and collaborating conflict styles, and significant negative correlations between compliance with avoiding and accommodating conflict styles.
Maintaining a compliance form allows residents and residency programs to focus on issues that affect performance and facilitate assessment of the ACGME competencies. Postgraduate year, behavior, and conflict styles appear to be associated with compliance. A lack of association with faculty evaluations suggests measurement of different perceptions of residents' behavior.
本文旨在开发并确定一份合规表格在评估和教授毕业后医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ACGME)的职业素养、基于实践的学习与改进以及基于系统的实践能力方面的效用。
2006年,我们在一个妇产科住院医师培训项目中引入了一份包含17项内容的合规表格。该表格前瞻性地监测住院医师参加必修活动的情况(5项)、履行规定义务的责任性(9项)以及完成指定项目的情况(3项)。使用托马斯 - 基尔曼冲突模式工具(Thomas-Kilmann Conflict MODE Instrument),将这些得分与教员对住院医师的评估、住院医师作为有贡献者或存在问题者的状态以及住院医师的冲突处理方式进行比较。
我们对2007 - 2008学年的18名住院医师进行分析,结果显示,第一年住院医师(PGY - 1)的平均得分(平均标准误)为577(65.3),第二年住院医师(PGY - 2)为692(42.4),第三年住院医师(PGY - 3)为535(23.3),第四年住院医师(PGY - 4)为651.6(37.4)。非西班牙裔白人住院医师在合规性、教员对人际沟通技能的评估以及基于系统的实践能力方面得分显著更高。与存在问题的住院医师相比,表现良好的住院医师在合规性方面得分显著更高。与低年资住院医师相比,高年资住院医师在责任性得分上显著更高,而低年资住院医师的项目完成得分有所增加。在学年的前6个月和后6个月之间,出勤得分增加,责任性得分显著下降。合规得分与竞争型和协作型冲突处理方式之间存在正相关,与回避型和迁就型冲突处理方式之间存在显著负相关。
维持一份合规表格能使住院医师和住院医师培训项目关注影响绩效的问题,并有助于对ACGME能力进行评估。住院医师培训年份、行为和冲突处理方式似乎与合规性相关。与教员评估缺乏关联表明对住院医师行为的不同认知存在衡量差异。