• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Review of randomized trials of homoeopathy.

作者信息

Hill C, Doyon F

机构信息

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

出版信息

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(2):139-47.

PMID:2197682
Abstract

The present review covers forty published randomized trials in which the results of a homoeopathic treatment were compared to those of a standard treatment, a placebo, or no treatment at all. These trials were identified after an extensive search through the literature. They cover a wide range of pathologies. Most were double-blind and used subjective and/or multiple endpoints. The median number of patients per group was 28. The analysis only included all the randomized patients in one third of the trials. In our opinion, the results do not provide acceptable evidence that homoeopathic treatments are effective.

摘要

相似文献

1
Review of randomized trials of homoeopathy.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(2):139-47.
2
Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us.介入性脊柱领域的前瞻性、双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验:最高质量文献告诉我们的内容。
Spine J. 2009 Aug;9(8):690-703. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.447. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
3
Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND).利鲁唑用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)/运动神经元病(MND)。
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003 Sep;4(3):191-206.
4
[Controlled randomized clinical trials].[对照随机临床试验]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2007 Apr-May;191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8.
5
A review of infliximab use in ulcerative colitis.英夫利昔单抗在溃疡性结肠炎中的应用综述。
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.014.
6
[Allergen-specific immune therapy in the treatment of asthma].[变应原特异性免疫疗法治疗哮喘]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Jan 24;162(4):477-9.
7
[A meta-analysis of homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca].[用白花假紫荆进行顺势疗法治疗花粉症的荟萃分析]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(14):323-7.
8
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.顺势疗法的临床效果是安慰剂效应吗?顺势疗法与对抗疗法的安慰剂对照试验比较研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9487):726-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2.
9
Clinical trials of homoeopathy.顺势疗法的临床试验。
BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316.
10
Randomised controlled trials for homoeopathy. Studies comparing homoeopathy and placebo are unhelpful.
BMJ. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):41; author reply 41.

引用本文的文献

1
Hormesis and homeopathy: The artificial twins.兴奋效应与顺势疗法:人造双胞胎。
J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):74-7. doi: 10.5455/jice.20140929114417. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
2
[The efficacy of classic homeopathic therapy in chronic headache. Study protocol.].
Schmerz. 1992 Jun;6(2):134-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02528131.
3
Ultramolecular homeopathy has no observable clinical effects. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proving trial of Belladonna 30C.超分子顺势疗法没有可观察到的临床效果。一项关于颠茄30C的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照验证试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;56(5):562-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01900.x.
4
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine.系统评价的客观性如何?补充医学相关评价之间的差异。
J R Soc Med. 2003 Jan;96(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600105.
5
Homoeopathy.顺势疗法
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):189-94. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.189.
6
Systematic reviews of complementary therapies - an annotated bibliography. Part 3: homeopathy.补充疗法的系统评价——带注释的文献目录。第3部分:顺势疗法。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-1-4. Epub 2001 Jul 20.
7
Veterinary homeopathy--a rebuttal.兽医顺势疗法——反驳
Can Vet J. 2000 Jan;41(1):3-4.
8
[A critical evaluation of unconventional diagnostic and therapeutic methods in dentistry].[牙科非传统诊断与治疗方法的批判性评估]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992 Aug;53(4):239-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02327641.