Suppr超能文献

骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁和便秘术后问题:系统文献回顾和治疗指南。

Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline.

机构信息

Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Nov;54(11):1443-60. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318227f65d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of knowledge on the incidence and management of suboptimal therapeutic effect and the complications associated with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review current literature on postoperative issues and to propose a treatment algorithm.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched using the keywords "sacral nerve stimulation," "sacral neuromodulation," "fecal incontinence," and "constipation" for English-language articles published from January 1980 to August 2010. A further search was conducted on a wider literature using the keywords "complication," "adverse effect," "treatment failure," "equipment failure," "infection," "foreign-body migration," "reoperation," "pain," and "algorithm."

STUDY SELECTION

Four hundred sixty-one titles were identified, and after a title and abstract review, 135 were subjected to full article review; 89 were finally included in this review. Five articles were added by manual search and consensus.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were identified as cohort studies reporting on postoperative issues, including 1661 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation and 1600 patients who proceeded to sacral nerve stimulation therapy. Pooled data showed that the most common problem during percutaneous nerve evaluation was lead displacement (5.3%). The incidence of suboptimal outcome, pain, and infection after implantation was 12.1%, 13.0%, and 3.9%.

LIMITATIONS

There was significant underreporting of untoward events, because 60% of the studies did not report complications during percutaneous nerve evaluation, and suboptimal outcome after implantation was not disclosed in 44% of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of untoward events associated with sacral nerve stimulation appears to be low. However, there is a significant underreporting of the incidence. Using the information from the structured and systematic literature review, we formulated a clinically relevant guideline for reporting and managing postoperative issues. The guideline can provide a framework for clinical practice.

摘要

背景

对于骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁和便秘的疗效不佳和相关并发症的发生率和处理方法,目前知识有限。

目的

本研究旨在回顾当前文献中关于术后问题,并提出治疗方案。

资料来源

使用关键词“骶神经刺激”、“骶神经调节”、“粪便失禁”和“便秘”,在 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中检索 1980 年 1 月至 2010 年 8 月发表的英文文献。还使用关键词“并发症”、“不良反应”、“治疗失败”、“设备故障”、“感染”、“异物迁移”、“再手术”、“疼痛”和“算法”,对更广泛的文献进行了进一步检索。

研究选择

共确定了 461 个标题,经过标题和摘要审查,有 135 个进行了全文审查;最终有 89 个被纳入本综述。通过手动搜索和共识增加了 5 篇文章。

结果

有 48 项研究被确定为队列研究,报告了术后问题,包括 1661 例接受经皮神经评估的患者和 1600 例接受骶神经刺激治疗的患者。汇总数据显示,经皮神经评估过程中最常见的问题是导线移位(5.3%)。植入后效果不佳、疼痛和感染的发生率分别为 12.1%、13.0%和 3.9%。

局限性

不良事件的报告明显不足,因为 60%的研究没有报告经皮神经评估期间的并发症,44%的研究没有披露植入后效果不佳的情况。

结论

骶神经刺激相关不良事件的发生率似乎较低。然而,不良事件的报告明显不足。利用结构化和系统的文献综述信息,我们制定了一个与临床相关的报告和处理术后问题的指南。该指南可为临床实践提供框架。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验