• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Establishing a multicentre clinical research network: lessons learned.建立多中心临床研究网络:经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(5):e243-9. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i5.814.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Sustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research Network.维持研究网络:健康维护组织研究网络的二十年经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jun 9;2(2):1067. eCollection 2014.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Key characteristics and critical junctures for successful Interprofessional networks in healthcare - a case study.成功的医疗保健跨专业网络的关键特征和关键节点——案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05565-z.
9
Building a Governance Strategy for CER: The Patient Outcomes Research to Advance Learning (PORTAL) Network Experience.构建比较效果研究的治理策略:推进学习的患者结局研究(PORTAL)网络经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 28;4(2):1216. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1216. eCollection 2016.
10
Networks as systems.作为系统的网络
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):9-24. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2017-0129. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Research Network: JHCRN Infrastructure and Lessons Learned.临床研究网络:JHCRN 基础设施及经验教训
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70123. doi: 10.1111/cts.70123.
2
Kidney Disease Aging Research Collaborative (KDARC): Addressing barriers in geriatric nephrology research.肾脏疾病与衰老研究协作组(KDARC):解决老年肾脏病研究中的障碍。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr;73(4):1319-1323. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19229. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Challenges hindering emergency physicians; involvement in multicenter collaborative studies in Japan: A nationwide survey analysis.阻碍日本急诊医生参与多中心协作研究的挑战:一项全国性调查分析。
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Nov 23;10(1):e906. doi: 10.1002/ams2.906. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Multi-centric clinic trials in evidence-based research - A narrative review on the Indian scenario.循证研究中的多中心临床试验——关于印度情况的叙述性综述
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 May;12(5):863-867. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2257_22. Epub 2023 May 31.
5
Research activities in general medicine: a scoping survey by the Internal Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand.一般医学研究活动:澳大利亚和新西兰内科医师学会的范围调查。
Intern Med J. 2022 Sep;52(9):1505-1512. doi: 10.1111/imj.15866. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Activities supporting the growth of Clinical Trial Networks in Australia.支持澳大利亚临床试验网络发展的活动。
Trials. 2022 Jan 28;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05974-3.
7
Successful Strategies and Areas of Improvement-Lessons Learned from Design and Conduction of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial in Palliative Care, 'Palliative-D'.成功策略与改进领域——从姑息治疗随机安慰剂对照试验“Palliative-D”的设计与实施中吸取的经验教训
Life (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;11(11):1233. doi: 10.3390/life11111233.
8
Experience of establishing and coordinating a nationwide network for bidirectional intussusception surveillance in India: lessons for multisite research studies.在印度建立和协调全国性双向肠套叠监测网络的经验:多地点研究的经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 28;11(5):e046827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046827.
9
Using a cross-contextual reciprocal learning approach in a multisite implementation research project to improve self-management for type 2 diabetes.在一个多地点实施研究项目中采用跨情境互惠学习方法,以改善2型糖尿病的自我管理。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 26;3(6):e001068. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001068. eCollection 2018.
10
Sustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research Network.维持研究网络:健康维护组织研究网络的二十年经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jun 9;2(2):1067. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers, enablers, and incentives for research participation: a report from the Ambulatory Care Research Network (ACRN).研究参与的障碍、促进因素和激励措施:门诊护理研究网络(ACRN)的一份报告。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):436-45. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.090017.
2
Investigator-led clinical research consortia: the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.研究者主导的临床研究联盟:加拿大重症监护试验组
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S165-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181921079.
3
Signposts along the NIH roadmap for reengineering clinical research: lessons from the Clinical Research Networks initiative.美国国立卫生研究院临床研究再造路线图中的路标:临床研究网络计划的经验教训。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1919-25. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1919.
4
Models of inter-institutional collaboration to build research capacity for reducing health disparities.建立研究能力以减少健康差距的机构间合作模式。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.11.001.
5
The physical therapy clinical research network (PTClinResNet): methods, efficacy, and benefits of a rehabilitation research network.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;87(11):937-50. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178fc.
6
Evaluating primary care research networks.评估初级保健研究网络。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2007 Aug;20(3):162-73. doi: 10.1258/095148407781395955.
7
Promoting public health: benefits and challenges of a Europeanwide research consortium on student health.促进公众健康:欧洲范围内学生健康研究联盟的益处与挑战
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2007 Jun;15(2):58-65. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3418.
8
University students' emotions, interest and activities in a web-based learning environment.大学生在网络学习环境中的情绪、兴趣及活动。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Mar;78(Pt 1):163-78. doi: 10.1348/000709907X203733.
9
Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN).协作性儿科重症监护研究网络(CPCCRN)
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;7(4):301-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000227106.66902.4F.
10
Data sharing and intellectual property in a genomic epidemiology network: policies for large-scale research collaboration.基因组流行病学网络中的数据共享与知识产权:大规模研究合作政策
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 May;84(5):382-7. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.029843. Epub 2006 May 17.

建立多中心临床研究网络:经验教训。

Establishing a multicentre clinical research network: lessons learned.

机构信息

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services Cancer Care, Calgary, AB.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(5):e243-9. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i5.814.

DOI:10.3747/co.v18i5.814
PMID:21980256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3185906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within many health care disciplines, research networks have emerged to connect researchers who are physically separated, to facilitate sharing of expertise and resources, and to exchange valuable skills. A multicentre research network committed to studying difficult cancer pain problems was launched in 2004 as part of a Canadian initiative to increase palliative and end-of-life care research capacity. Funding was received for 5 years to support network activities.

METHODS

Mid-way through the 5-year granting period, an external review panel provided a formal mid-grant evaluation. Concurrently, an internal evaluation of the network by survey of its members was conducted. Based on feedback from both evaluations and on a review of the literature, we identified several components believed to be relevant to the development of a successful clinical cancer research network.

RESULTS

THESE COMMON ELEMENTS OF SUCCESSFUL CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH NETWORKS WERE IDENTIFIED: shared vision, formal governance policies and terms of reference, infrastructure support, regular and effective communication, an accountability framework, a succession planning strategy to address membership change over time, multiple strategies to engage network members, regular review of goals and timelines, and a balance between structure and creativity.

CONCLUSIONS

In establishing and conducting a multi-year, multicentre clinical cancer research network, network members were led to reflect on the factors that contributed most to the achievement of network goals. Several specific factors were identified that seemed to be highly relevant in promoting success. These observations are presented to foster further discussion on the successful design and operation of research networks.

摘要

背景

在许多医疗保健学科中,已经出现了研究网络,将物理上分离的研究人员联系在一起,以促进专业知识和资源的共享,并交流有价值的技能。一个致力于研究癌症疼痛难题的多中心研究网络于 2004 年成立,作为加拿大提高姑息治疗和临终关怀研究能力倡议的一部分。该网络获得了为期 5 年的资金支持,以支持网络活动。

方法

在 5 年拨款期的中途,外部评审小组提供了正式的中期拨款评估。同时,对网络成员进行了内部评估。根据这两个评估以及对文献的回顾,我们确定了几个被认为与成功开展临床癌症研究网络相关的组成部分。

结果

这些成功的临床癌症研究网络的共同要素包括:共同愿景、正式的治理政策和职权范围、基础设施支持、定期有效的沟通、问责制框架、解决成员随时间变化的继任规划策略、多种吸引网络成员的策略、定期审查目标和时间表,以及结构和创造力之间的平衡。

结论

在建立和开展多年的多中心临床癌症研究网络时,网络成员被引导思考对实现网络目标贡献最大的因素。确定了几个似乎对促进成功非常重要的具体因素。这些观察结果旨在促进对研究网络的成功设计和运作的进一步讨论。