Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Dec;12(13):1214-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70260-1. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
The importance of matching at the HLA C locus has not been well defined for unrelated umbilical-cord blood transplantation. The selection algorithm for umbilical-cord blood units generally considers intermediate resolution HLA typing at A and B and allele-level typing at DRB1. We aimed to establish the relative importance of additional matching at HLA C.
We used Cox regression to assess retrospectively the effect of donor-recipient HLA matching on outcomes of single umbilical-cord blood transplantations for leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Our primary endpoint was transplant-related mortality. HLA typing was done with molecular techniques with a minimum of intermediate resolution for HLA A, B, and C, and at the allele-level for DRB1.
The median age of our study population was 10 years (range <1-62) and 552 (69%) of 803 patients were aged 16 years or younger at transplantation. Compared with transplantations matched at HLA A, B, C, and DRB1 (n=69), transplant-related mortality risk was higher after transplantations matched at HLA A, B, and DRB1 and mismatched at HLA C (n=23; HR 3·97, 95% CI 1·27-12·40; p=0·018). Transplant-related mortality risk was also higher after transplantations with a single mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 and mismatched at HLA C (n=234; 1·70, 1·06-2·74; p=0·029) compared with transplantations matched at HLA C with a single mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 (n=127). Assessing the overall effect of HLA disparity on transplant-related mortality, risks were higher with units mismatched at two (n=259; 3·27, 1·42-7·54; p=0·006), three (n=253; 3·34, 1·45-7·71; p=0·005), or four (n=75; 3·51, 1·44-8·58; p=0·006) loci compared with matched units (n=69).
Our data suggest that the present strategy for umbilical-cord blood unit selection should be reassessed; matching at HLA C for units that are matched at HLA A, B, or DRB1 or in the presence of a single locus mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 should be included to minimise mortality risks.
National Cancer Institute, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, US Department of the Navy, Children's Leukemia Research Association, and INSERM.
对于无关脐带血移植,HLA-C 位点的匹配重要性尚未得到很好的定义。脐带血单位的选择算法通常考虑 A、B 位点的中等分辨率 HLA 分型和 DRB1 等位基因水平的分型。我们旨在确定在 HLA-C 上进行额外匹配的相对重要性。
我们使用 Cox 回归回顾性评估了供受者 HLA 匹配对白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征的单份脐带血移植结局的影响。我们的主要终点是移植相关死亡率。HLA 分型采用分子技术进行,HLA A、B 和 C 的分辨率至少为中等,DRB1 的分辨率为等位基因水平。
我们研究人群的中位年龄为 10 岁(范围<1-62),803 例患者中有 552 例(69%)在移植时年龄为 16 岁或以下。与 HLA A、B、C 和 DRB1 匹配的移植(n=69)相比,HLA A、B 和 DRB1 匹配而 HLA C 不匹配的移植(n=23;HR 3.97,95%CI 1.27-12.40;p=0.018)的移植相关死亡率风险更高。与 HLA C 匹配而 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的移植(n=234;1.70,1.06-2.74;p=0.029)相比,HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配而 HLA C 不匹配的移植(n=127)的移植相关死亡率风险更高。评估 HLA 不合对移植相关死亡率的总体影响,与 HLA C 匹配且 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的单位相比,两个(n=259;3.27,1.42-7.54;p=0.006)、三个(n=253;3.34,1.45-7.71;p=0.005)或四个(n=75;3.51,1.44-8.58;p=0.006)错配单位的风险更高。
我们的数据表明,目前的脐带血单位选择策略应重新评估;对于与 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 匹配或 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的单位,应进行 HLA-C 匹配,以最大限度地降低死亡率风险。
美国国立癌症研究所、美国国家心肺血液研究所、美国国家过敏和传染病研究所、白血病和淋巴瘤协会、美国海军部、儿童白血病研究协会和法国国家健康与医学研究院。