Suppr超能文献

供受者 HLA-A、B、C、DRB1 匹配对白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者脐血移植后结局的影响:一项回顾性分析。

Effect of donor-recipient HLA matching at HLA A, B, C, and DRB1 on outcomes after umbilical-cord blood transplantation for leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2011 Dec;12(13):1214-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70260-1. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of matching at the HLA C locus has not been well defined for unrelated umbilical-cord blood transplantation. The selection algorithm for umbilical-cord blood units generally considers intermediate resolution HLA typing at A and B and allele-level typing at DRB1. We aimed to establish the relative importance of additional matching at HLA C.

METHODS

We used Cox regression to assess retrospectively the effect of donor-recipient HLA matching on outcomes of single umbilical-cord blood transplantations for leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Our primary endpoint was transplant-related mortality. HLA typing was done with molecular techniques with a minimum of intermediate resolution for HLA A, B, and C, and at the allele-level for DRB1.

FINDINGS

The median age of our study population was 10 years (range <1-62) and 552 (69%) of 803 patients were aged 16 years or younger at transplantation. Compared with transplantations matched at HLA A, B, C, and DRB1 (n=69), transplant-related mortality risk was higher after transplantations matched at HLA A, B, and DRB1 and mismatched at HLA C (n=23; HR 3·97, 95% CI 1·27-12·40; p=0·018). Transplant-related mortality risk was also higher after transplantations with a single mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 and mismatched at HLA C (n=234; 1·70, 1·06-2·74; p=0·029) compared with transplantations matched at HLA C with a single mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 (n=127). Assessing the overall effect of HLA disparity on transplant-related mortality, risks were higher with units mismatched at two (n=259; 3·27, 1·42-7·54; p=0·006), three (n=253; 3·34, 1·45-7·71; p=0·005), or four (n=75; 3·51, 1·44-8·58; p=0·006) loci compared with matched units (n=69).

INTERPRETATION

Our data suggest that the present strategy for umbilical-cord blood unit selection should be reassessed; matching at HLA C for units that are matched at HLA A, B, or DRB1 or in the presence of a single locus mismatch at HLA A, B, or DRB1 should be included to minimise mortality risks.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, US Department of the Navy, Children's Leukemia Research Association, and INSERM.

摘要

背景

对于无关脐带血移植,HLA-C 位点的匹配重要性尚未得到很好的定义。脐带血单位的选择算法通常考虑 A、B 位点的中等分辨率 HLA 分型和 DRB1 等位基因水平的分型。我们旨在确定在 HLA-C 上进行额外匹配的相对重要性。

方法

我们使用 Cox 回归回顾性评估了供受者 HLA 匹配对白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征的单份脐带血移植结局的影响。我们的主要终点是移植相关死亡率。HLA 分型采用分子技术进行,HLA A、B 和 C 的分辨率至少为中等,DRB1 的分辨率为等位基因水平。

结果

我们研究人群的中位年龄为 10 岁(范围<1-62),803 例患者中有 552 例(69%)在移植时年龄为 16 岁或以下。与 HLA A、B、C 和 DRB1 匹配的移植(n=69)相比,HLA A、B 和 DRB1 匹配而 HLA C 不匹配的移植(n=23;HR 3.97,95%CI 1.27-12.40;p=0.018)的移植相关死亡率风险更高。与 HLA C 匹配而 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的移植(n=234;1.70,1.06-2.74;p=0.029)相比,HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配而 HLA C 不匹配的移植(n=127)的移植相关死亡率风险更高。评估 HLA 不合对移植相关死亡率的总体影响,与 HLA C 匹配且 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的单位相比,两个(n=259;3.27,1.42-7.54;p=0.006)、三个(n=253;3.34,1.45-7.71;p=0.005)或四个(n=75;3.51,1.44-8.58;p=0.006)错配单位的风险更高。

结论

我们的数据表明,目前的脐带血单位选择策略应重新评估;对于与 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 匹配或 HLA A、B 或 DRB1 有单个错配的单位,应进行 HLA-C 匹配,以最大限度地降低死亡率风险。

资助

美国国立癌症研究所、美国国家心肺血液研究所、美国国家过敏和传染病研究所、白血病和淋巴瘤协会、美国海军部、儿童白血病研究协会和法国国家健康与医学研究院。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Umbilical cord blood transplantation: Still growing and improving.脐带血移植:不断发展和完善。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021 Nov;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S62-S74. doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0495.

本文引用的文献

2
Unrelated umbilical cord blood unit selection.无关脐带血单位的选择。
Semin Hematol. 2010 Jan;47(1):13-21. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.10.003.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验