Suppr超能文献

患者与物理治疗师、整骨师和脊医之间的共同决策是否会改善慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的护理?

Will shared decision making between patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and physiotherapists, osteopaths and chiropractors improve patient care?

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29(2):203-12. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr083. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is treated in primary care by a wide range of health professionals including chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists.

AIMS

To explore patients and chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists' beliefs about CMP and its treatment and how these beliefs influenced care seeking and ultimately the process of care.

METHODS

Depth interviews with a purposive sample of 13 CMP patients and 19 primary care health professionals (5 osteopaths, 4 chiropractors and 10 physiotherapists).

RESULTS

Patients' models of their CMP evolved throughout the course of their condition. Health professionals' models also evolved throughout the course of their treatment of patients. A key influence on patients' consulting behaviour appeared to be finding someone who would legitimate their suffering and their condition. Health professionals also recognized patients' need for legitimation but often found that attempts to explore psychological factors, which may be influencing their pain could be construed by patients as delegitimizing. Patients developed and tailored their consultation strategies throughout their illness career but not always in a strategic fashion. Health professionals also reflected on how patients' developing knowledge and changing beliefs altered their expectations. Therefore, overall within our analysis, we identified three themes: 'the evolving nature of patients and health professionals models of understanding CMP'; 'legitimating suffering' and 'development and tailoring of consultation and treatment strategies throughout patients' illness careers'.

CONCLUSIONS

Seeking care for any condition is not static but a process particularly for long-term conditions such as CMP. This may need to be taken into account by both CMP patients and their treating health professionals, in that both should not assume that their views about causation and treatment are static and that instead they should be revisited on a regular basis. Adopting a shared decision-making approach to treatment may be useful particularly for long-term conditions; however, in some cases, this may be easier said than done due to both patients' and health professionals' sometimes discomfort with adopting such an approach. Training and support for both health professionals and patients may be helpful in facilitating a shared decision-making approach.

摘要

背景

慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)在初级保健中由广泛的卫生专业人员治疗,包括脊椎按摩师、整骨师和物理治疗师。

目的

探讨患者和脊椎按摩师、整骨师和物理治疗师对 CMP 及其治疗的信念,以及这些信念如何影响寻求治疗,并最终影响治疗过程。

方法

对 13 名 CMP 患者和 19 名初级保健卫生专业人员(5 名整骨师、4 名脊椎按摩师和 10 名物理治疗师)进行了有针对性的深度访谈。

结果

患者对 CMP 的模型在疾病过程中不断演变。卫生专业人员的模型也在治疗患者的过程中不断演变。影响患者咨询行为的一个关键因素似乎是找到一个能够认可他们的痛苦和病情的人。卫生专业人员也认识到患者需要认可,但他们经常发现,试图探讨可能影响他们疼痛的心理因素,可能会被患者认为是不认可的。患者在疾病生涯中发展和调整他们的咨询策略,但并不总是以策略的方式。卫生专业人员也反思了患者不断发展的知识和变化的信念如何改变了他们的期望。因此,在我们的分析中,我们确定了三个主题:“患者和卫生专业人员对 CMP 理解模型的演变性质”;“认可痛苦”和“在患者的疾病生涯中发展和调整咨询和治疗策略”。

结论

寻求任何疾病的治疗都不是静态的,而是一个过程,特别是对于慢性疾病,如 CMP。这可能需要 CMP 患者及其治疗卫生专业人员都考虑到,他们都不应该认为他们对病因和治疗的看法是静态的,而应该定期重新审视。采用共同决策的治疗方法可能对长期疾病是有用的;然而,在某些情况下,由于患者和卫生专业人员有时对采用这种方法感到不舒服,这可能说起来容易做起来难。对卫生专业人员和患者进行培训和支持可能有助于促进共同决策的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验